Hello all,
I got the monitor program working and connected to the PRS-45A Cs. Attached is
the screenshot of the data I got. Can anyone translate the data into something
meaningful for me as a newbie? Is this thing healthy?
Thanks all
Eugene
___
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 10:07:44 -0800
Tom McDermott tom.n...@gmail.com wrote:
While compensating for cable delay is relatively straight forward by
measuring the length and compensating for
the velocity factor, a question is: how much amplifier / filter group delay
is to be expected within the
Don't remove the serial mouse, just disable it. If you remove it, it
will return on the next reboot.
On 2/7/2015 9:11 AM, Jim Lux wrote:
There's also the whole microsoft serial mouse device problem. A
typical Windows 7 install (and other versions as well) will have a MS
serial mouse device
Hej Attila,
On 02/06/2015 01:22 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:
Moin Magnus,
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 07:07:54 +0100
Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
For oscillators, they should have been turned on long enough such that
any drift is negligible. Alternatively you process out the
Hi Eugene,
A quick look, it looks healthy. About 2 years of tube operation, you
should be good for quite some time.
Cheers,
Magnus
On 02/08/2015 06:45 AM, W2HX wrote:
Hello all,
I got the monitor program working and connected to the PRS-45A Cs. Attached is
the screenshot of the data I
Attila,
On 02/08/2015 11:11 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 10:07:44 -0800
Tom McDermott tom.n...@gmail.com wrote:
While compensating for cable delay is relatively straight forward by
measuring the length and compensating for
the velocity factor, a question is: how much amplifier
On 2/8/15 2:11 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 10:07:44 -0800
Tom McDermott tom.n...@gmail.com wrote:
While compensating for cable delay is relatively straight forward by
measuring the length and compensating for
the velocity factor, a question is: how much amplifier / filter group
I think that the surplus HP/Agilent GPS splitters may have an SAW
filter. If so, measuring the delay of one of those could yield at least
an approximation.
I may have that data laying around; I'll do some digging.
John
On 02/08/2015 05:11 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015
j...@febo.com said:
OK, so I had an HP 58535A two-port GPS splitter handy and put it on the
VNA. It clearly has a filter of some sort, as shown by the S21 frequency
response. The delay at the center of the passband is about 21ns, and it
increases to about 26ns at the edges.
Thanks.
It
OK, so I had an HP 58535A two-port GPS splitter handy and put it on the
VNA. It clearly has a filter of some sort, as shown by the S21
frequency response. The delay at the center of the passband is about
21ns, and it increases to about 26ns at the edges.
That delay consists of the physical
Hi all.
The papers are:
1) SAW Filter Modeling in MATLAB for GNSS Receivers, S.H. Abbas, et al.,
IJECE Oct 2013, ISSN: 2088-2078
The authors de-embed the group delay using FFT and MATLAB. Eyeball about
15-20 nsec. for a pretty wide filter.
2) The Effects of SAW Group Delay Ripple on GPS and
MSF Scheduled Maintenance Periods
The MSF 60 kHz standard-frequency and time signal, broadcast by Babcock on
behalf of NPL, is occasionally taken off-air to allow maintenance work on
the masts and antennas at Anthorn Radio Station to be carried out in safety.
This means that your
12 matches
Mail list logo