francesco.messi...@gmail.com said:
> I measured the PPS output with an HP-5328B, PPS of the thunderbolt as start,
> rising edge, rockwell PPS as stop, rising edge. The delay is 406.3 ms +/- 30
> uS.
> Are those numbers normal for a rockwell chipset? Any idea why the two PPS
> are so far apart? P
>>Hi Time-Nuts:
>>Not sure what the protocol is here but I'll just jump in.
>
>>I've just purchased an HP53310a modulation domain analyzer. Most you already
>>know that these amazing instruments are basically a TIC with a graphic
>>display of frequency vs time. I've always wanted one to record PL
j...@febo.com said:
> For each reading I clear the counter, then poll using SRQ until data is
> ready. The measurement cycle seems to always take between 1.5 and 2
> seconds, even if the start/stop signals arrive almost immediately. The GPIB
> timeouts are short enough that I don't think they ar
Hi all,
I'm testing a custom (and unknown to me) GPS board I had for free some
years ago. It has a 10 KHz output and 1 PPS output.
Using a thunderbolt as reference, 10 KHz output is abut 13 mHz higher
(10 MHz output of the thunderbolt is the time base of the counter,
HP-5386A).
I measured the PPS
I'm working on a measurement setup using an HP 5334 TIC to capture single-shot
PPS data that I log via GPIB.
For each reading I clear the counter, then poll using SRQ until data is ready.
The measurement cycle seems to always take between 1.5 and 2 seconds, even if
the start/stop signals arriv
