But speculations half the fun.
Interesting chart.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Pieter-Tjerk de Boer wrote:
>
> On http://websdr.ewi.utwente.nl:8901/fullday/ , one can see that the extra
> LORAN signal has been on the air roughly from 16:26 till 17:30 UTC: the
> waterfall c
On http://websdr.ewi.utwente.nl:8901/fullday/ , one can see that the extra
LORAN signal has been on the air roughly from 16:26 till 17:30 UTC: the
waterfall clearly shows that the total received power around 100 kHz was
higher during that time.
One also sees that just _before_ the start of the "e
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 11:11:50 +
Philip Pemberton wrote:
> I've even contacted the RIN, but -- from what they told me -- they don't
> archive their journals (that's under the remit of Cambridge University
> Press) or conference proceedings...
That's weird. The RIN website has an explicit conf
If I remember correctly the GLA(Trinity Ho.) has a contact with Babcock who
run Anthorn which goes through to 2019 or 2020. The notice to mariners did
not mention Anthorn but it did request that nav. receivers be turned off. If
TH terminate that contact they will presumably have to pay Babcock a
Nigel
In the US at least for the eastern half of the country the test station has
been on lately for several weeks at a shot. Not exactly the old days but a
great resource besides GPS to check my various references and note offsets
and such using the austrons and SRS.
I would agree 1 db difference
This could just be wishful thinking but I'm still hoping it might stay for
some time yet.
The UK General Lighthouse Authorities have been running their eLoran trials
since 2007 so perhaps they found sufficient incentive within that time to
keep going.
Time will tell, but as you suggest I'
I'm pretty sure it was Anthorn.
It was showing as the Master and Y stations, and the individual signal
levels as indicated on an FS700 were within 1dB, which would seem a reasonable
tolerance on equal signal levels given that the FS700 only reports to the
nearest 1dB anyway:-)
Still just
I somewhat may guess its Anthorn.
My 2 cents from across the ocean.
The Brits are pretty good about shutting things down. The fact that Anthorn
stayed operational was pretty odd even if you thought the new years parties
got in the way. Lets face it drink beer with friends or shut a transmitter
in
>As of 1725, 4th January, Lessay seems to have been transmitting again
for
>at least 30 minutes, and showing the same or a slightly stronger signal
>here on the west coast of Scotland than Anthorn.
Are you sure it's not UK trying to rig something up for their eLoran trials
?
=
In message <576b98.2a1f5672.43bc0...@aol.com>, GandalfG8--- via time-nuts
writes:
>As of 1725, 4th January, Lessay seems to have been transmitting again for
>at least 30 minutes, and showing the same or a slightly stronger signal
>here on the west coast of Scotland than Anthorn.
Are
Definitely something unusual going on, overall signal level as monitored on
an SDR is significantly lower than normal and seems to have dropped out
from time to time, and as of approximately 1750 the master signal is no
longer present.
Regards
Nigel
GM8PZR
In a message dated 04/01/201
As of 1725, 4th January, Lessay seems to have been transmitting again for
at least 30 minutes, and showing the same or a slightly stronger signal
here on the west coast of Scotland than Anthorn.
I've never seen this before, Anthorn is much closer and has always been a
stronger signal so I'm
12 matches
Mail list logo