Re: [time-nuts] pick and place problems/design (was: OT stuffing boards)

2016-06-24 Thread Chris Albertson
The ideal hobby use pick and place machine would be very different from a commercial machine. Lets say I want one board made. What I want to minimize is my time. With a conventional machine by FAR most of my time is spent setting the machine up. In fact setup is so slow that for smaller PCBs I

[time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Mark Sims
I have seen pick and place systems built around CNC machines (same applies to 3D printers). The reel strips are fed through a slotted guide. The pickup head has a finger (or some use the pickup nozzle... a flat tipped hypodermic needle) that is used to advance the reel. It drops down into th

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: Saving the thread

2016-06-24 Thread Bill Hawkins
The problem is editing out all of the redundant material. It's tedious by hand. Anyone got a program to do that? Say, in perl . . . Bill Hawkins -Original Message- From: John Ackermann N8UR Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 1:36 PM You know, this thread has had a tremendous amount of practica

[time-nuts] pick and place problems/design (was: OT stuffing boards)

2016-06-24 Thread Attila Kinali
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:59:58 -0500 "Graham / KE9H" wrote: > Lots of problems to be solved... Most of these problems are easy: > How do you take loose parts or cut tape or tape reels You don't. No loose parts with any kind of pick&place machine. As for cut tape, these can be taped on an empty

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Attila Kinali
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:41:05 -0500 Oz-in-DFW wrote: > On 6/24/2016 8:23 AM, Attila Kinali wrote: > > The advantage of "professional" > > companies like Alktech over "hobbyist" companies like macrofab is, > > that you get full professional support while the price does not differ much. > > E.g. wh

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Chris Albertson
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Don Latham wrote: > I do not see why a small pick and place assist system could not be built on a > 3-d printer. You are not the first to think of this. But the problem is 1) moving the reels of parts, 2) programming the machine. Translating the PCB design

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Adrian Godwin
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Attila Kinali wrote: > > The trick is to use semi-manual pick&place machines for low volumes. > Ie machines that you do not program, but guide by hand. This allows > faster and more accurate placing of components than would be possible > with a pure manual process

[time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Mark Sims
I've done a over one hundred boards with a Kapton stencil without any problems (0603 size parts) and 50 boards with a stencil cut out of vellum paper (a plasticized paper available at craft stores, red cuts very well with 405nm lasers) by my home-made laser cutter head for a desktop CNC mill

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Bob Camp
Hi A “low cost” auto pick and place does have some things in common with a 3D printer: Drive is by stepper motors Micro stepping stepper motor drivers are used Belt drive is pretty common Tube support and circular ball bearings are generally used You have X, Y and Z drive Very custom software to

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread David
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 20:01:24 +0100, you wrote: >... > >I definitely concur with the 'make it SMT as much as possible' plan - >pin-mount stuff is a pain. Also, QFN is far preferable to QFP, as >catalogue suppliers don't always manage to ship fine-pitch stuff >without bending legs in one direction o

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping

2016-06-24 Thread Nick Sayer via time-nuts
> On Jun 23, 2016, at 6:28 PM, Jay Grizzard > wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:28:00PM +, Mark Sims wrote: >> A usable re-flow oven can be had for $300. > > Do you (or anyone) have suggestions for usable reflow ovens in this price > range? I sell a reflow oven conversion kit on Tind

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Steve Wiseman
On 24 June 2016 at 14:23, Attila Kinali wrote: > Unlike what most people seem to think, small batches of PCBs have always > been a business for some assembly companies. For my sins, I am one of those... (Cambridge, UK). Yes - semi-manual assembly is the way it goes, especially for the active par

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Graham / KE9H
Don Latham said to Discussion I do not see why a small pick and place assist system could not be built on a 3-d printer. Lots of problems to be solved... How do you take loose parts or cut tape or tape reels and get the right part out, and into the chuck, oriented in the right direction? How man

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping

2016-06-24 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
You know, this thread has had a tremendous amount of practical information, with actual URLs, etc. Would someone be willing to consolidate the info on a web page somewhere? > On Jun 24, 2016, at 9:56 AM, Oz-in-DFW wrote: > > On 6/23/2016 10:53 PM, Chris Albertson wrote: >>> Am I missing some

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Bob Camp
Hi If you are doing a board with a few hundred parts on it (as earlier mentioned). And have designed a “3D printer” pick and place that runs one reel at a time. And are running the printer slow to keep everything from going all over the place. And have a manual reel advance (no feeder) …. I c

[time-nuts] Components placer review

2016-06-24 Thread F Mitchell
Interesting product. Mitch W4OA https://www.elektormagazine.com/news/review-ec-placer-makes-placing-smd-components-a-piece-of-cake ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Oz-in-DFW
On 6/24/2016 8:23 AM, Attila Kinali wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 19:28:15 + (UTC) > Bob Stewart wrote: Lotsa stuff deleted >> One more related question before this topic dies, if you don't mind. >> What about the other side of building: stuffing the boards. My GPSDOs >> have about 120 parts p

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Oz-in-DFW
On 6/24/2016 9:32 AM, Attila Kinali wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:16:34 -0500 > Oz-in-DFW wrote: >> Solder stencils make **all** the difference. > Oh, yes! Please, do not try syringe dispensers! These fail more often than > they work. Also pay the additional couple of bucks to get a steel stenci

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Brooke Clarke
Hi: For IC pitches of 0.050" (1.27mm) hand soldering works fine, even for my vision when a stereo microscope is used. Elmer's glue to hold the chips is place. Getting boards from ExpressPCB that have solder mask helps to prevent bridging. Here is an example: http://www.prc68.com/I/BTSG.shtml

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Don Latham
I do not see why a small pick and place assist system could not be built on a 3-d printer. Don > On Jun 24, 2016, at 8:32 AM, Attila Kinali wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:16:34 -0500 > Oz-in-DFW wrote: > >> 1. Pick and place machines use a lot of floor space (even for the >>"small" one

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Attila Kinali
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:16:34 -0500 Oz-in-DFW wrote: > 1. Pick and place machines use a lot of floor space (even for the > "small" ones are more than 1/2 a bench.) > 2. Even the best ones require pretty continuous tuning. If you aren't > using them continuously each new run is a new and

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Oz-in-DFW
On 6/23/2016 9:36 PM, Bob Camp wrote: > Hi > > The gotcha with “really slow” is that once you print the solder paste on the > board, it has a very > limited “open air” life. If you don’t get the board done fairly quickly, your > soldering quality can > suffer quite a bit. > > Bob > For most of t

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping

2016-06-24 Thread Oz-in-DFW
On 6/23/2016 10:53 PM, Chris Albertson wrote: >> Am I missing some obvious cheapie oven without these types of problems? > > A lot of people are building them from Black and Decker (and the like) > toaster ovens. Use Arduino for controller or just eyeballs. oven > thermometer and wrist watch.I

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Attila Kinali
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 19:28:15 + (UTC) Bob Stewart wrote: > One more related question before this topic dies, if you don't mind. > What about the other side of building: stuffing the boards. My GPSDOs > have about 120 parts per board, plus some custom work on the SMA connectors. > Is there a s

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping

2016-06-24 Thread Dave M
Take a look at the oven at http://whizoo.com/buy . They sell several kits as well as a complete kit to modify a toaster oven, and a ready-to-go oven for $699, shipping included. According to the web site, it uses a B&D model T01303SB toaster oven, capable of handling an 8"x10.5" board. The oven

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping

2016-06-24 Thread Dan Kemppainen
I’ve been doing SMT assembly for 40 years. I have never ever seen anybody with a process that “just worked”. They all involve some amount of fine tuning and design optimization. Hi, Yep, The amount of tweaking required to get a good board build can be extensive. Part density, ground plane,

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Oz-in-DFW
Disclaimer: I've not used any of these yet. New style assembly houses are MUCH cheaper than traditional proto shops. The ones I'm planning on trying are: Macrofab (Houston) https://macrofab.com/ pcb:ng http://pcb.ng/index.html (currently in beta with **deep** discounts. $1/sq in + BoM cost

[time-nuts] Trimble / Symmetricom UCCM mini-GPSDO boards

2016-06-24 Thread Mark Sims
For those of you that have one of these... good-ish news. I have Lady Heather working with them (well, at least the Trimble works, the Symmetricoms have not arrived yet and there are a couple of known differences in their commands). I'll get the code out there when I have a chance to test it

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Bob Stewart
I've given thought to stencils, but without building something to prop my hands on, I'll smear the paste. So, I place up to 10 or 15 parts at a time and use the hot-air gun. To each his own, I guess. Bob --- GFS G

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping

2016-06-24 Thread Hal Murray
kb...@n1k.org said: > I’ve been doing SMT assembly for 40 years. I have never ever seen anybody > with a process that “just worked”. They all involve some amount of fine > tuning and design optimization. As an example... I remember supplying dead chips to the fab house so they could cal