Attached is a plot showing the measured floor of the sine wave loop
in the 5061A/B and also in the 5065A, along with plot of an HP 5061B
with a high performance tube.
The tube is the limiting factor.
As you can see the margin provided by the current design is substantial.
Also if you look at
Hi
There are a number of papers from the 70’s and 80’s digging into three corner
hat data. The net result often
would turn out to be “less than zero” noise on one of the DUT’s. Since that’s
physically impossible the technique
got a bit of “attention”. The Cliff Notes version of the results is
Hi John,
I had a chance to think about this some more after I pressed the send key. The
ionospheric effects are certainly going to be different if the distance in time
between tests is large. And, of course, there is the fact that the KS has a
pretty old receiver compared the Ublox I use, so
Longer runs would be better to the extent that they give you smaller error bars
in your tau range of interest, certainly. But any effects that influence one
of your runs but not the others will render the 3-cornered hat solution
questionable, if not outright invalid. Only through many
https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-April/thread.html
We did some testing to evaluate the advantages of square wave
modulation instead of sine waves for locking to the atomic resonance
peak. We drove J1 on the A3 board with a 2.8 Volt peak to peak
triangle at 20 cps from a signal
Hi
If your MCU has a POR that resets the internal oscillator that’s an unusual
part. Most
of them I’ve seen simply reset the CPU…..Once the 8 MHz crystal oscillator is
running
at 37 to 53 MHz (or KHz) it may or may not ever return to 8 MHz on it’s own.
Yes, you
need to get into some nutty
I can't say I have run into that issue with a MCU as most 21st century ones
have a decent POR and Brown out detect (which typically burns 10x more
current than a 32k XO + RTC, and may get switched off in battery
applications, and then problems can occur). What does seem to come up is
stuff hanging
For anyone interested in a fundamentals class on phase noise, I'm
teaching an online class with live instruction (including video
recordings in case you miss a class) titled "Phase Noise Fundamentals."
https://www.jitterlabs.com/support/training/phasenoiseclass
Register with the coupon code
Hi John,
Thanks! With lesser equipment, such as the 5370A, would longer runs be better?
I used a set of 1 hr runs and the result wasn't quite what I had expected.
However, it may be that I had mislabeled the files, and thus got the sources
confused. Of course, it may be that the ionospheric
On 4/13/17 6:17 AM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
Hi
It’s a good bet that there is at least one regulator IC inside any modern OCXO.
As you slowly ramp the input voltage on a regulator, various odd things may
or may not happen. A 1 mv / s ramp on the outside can be “who knows what”
at the oscillator level.
Hi
If the circulators are good to 10 MHz and you have eight of them to play with,
then certainly they can
be turned into isolators. Unless you have a really unique source of them, that
kind of gets this out of
the cheap seats.
The “why” of isolation is very application dependent. Without
Hi
It’s a good bet that there is at least one regulator IC inside any modern OCXO.
As you slowly ramp the input voltage on a regulator, various odd things may
or may not happen. A 1 mv / s ramp on the outside can be “who knows what”
at the oscillator level. That said, slow voltage ramps are a
Hi
You likely would get more noise density out of the NE-2 than the incandescent
bulb. The
advantage of the incandescent is that you can estimate the temperature fairly
accurately
and thus come up with the noise by calculation. We did the build as part of a
radio club
meeting back in the
My LaCrosse UltrAtomic® clock arrived yesterday from Amazon. In my case,
the clock wasn't assembled on a Monday or a Friday, so nothing rattled,
and the packaging defeated the animals in shipping. The clock was
stopped, of course, at exactly 12:00. I installed four C-cells (big
spender!),
I have circulators but not on the splitter. Since there are no mixers down
stream, would reverse isolation be necessary in this application?
> On Apr 12, 2017, at 7:39 PM, Mark Sims wrote:
>
> My UCT-2008 rubidium reference uses the same splitter. It is driven by a
>
> It was mentioned that Timelab can do a three-cornered hat. I can't find it.
> Is
> this something that can only be done with multiple Timepods connected, or
> is there an option that I'm missing? Or is there some other tool that needs
> to be used? For the record, I want to create the
On 4/12/17 7:14 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:
10.9 MHz is likely the B-mode of the SC cut.
(It's a different mode, not a different overtone).
This mode has a tempco of 20 ppm and is used
to do thermometry.
IMHO, there is NO excuse for the oscillator
designer to design an oscillator that
17 matches
Mail list logo