RE: [time-nuts] Upper limit on phase noise from two oscillators. (fwd)

a discussion of physical clocks off the list? I haven't looked at a newsgroup since AOL started up. Bill Hawkins -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dr. David Kirkby Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 7:48 PM To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: RE: [time-nuts

RE: [time-nuts] 5061 Cs frequency shift with long time constant?

error. Please check the schematic. I thought long-term integration could only be done with a digital integrator. Bill Hawkins -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hubert v. Bonhorst Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 1:32 PM To: 'Discussion of precise

RE: [time-nuts] Strange effect with C-Field change

static electricity. It took a few accidents to figure that out after the war (the real war, WW2). Bill Hawkins ___ time-nuts mailing list time-nuts@febo.com https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

RE: [time-nuts] Strange effect with C-Field change

Well, if you figure out how to introduce a 100 mS delay with a short length of cable, you should see a patent attorney. Wait a minute. Aren't you using a homebrew divider to get 1 PPS from the 5061? That's a fine way to get long lasting offsets, but I can't imagine why it curved up or why the

RE: [time-nuts] time-nut-hams

I'm sure they're out there. If I had a license to transmit, I'd send code at one baud. Either the 1 PPS signal was there or it wasn't. Ought to be able to send a web page with dancing baloney ads in about 1000 days. Bill Hawkins -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

<    2   3   4   5   6   7