ile in fact
you were talking about wander in sense of ... well ... wander. Sorry for the
confusion.
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Daniel Ginsburg wrote:
>
>>
>> On 23.04.2013, at 6:15, Hal Murray wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> I wonder, what kind of ti
On 23.04.2013, at 6:15, Hal Murray wrote:
>
>> I wonder, what kind of timing GPS gives 112ns wander?
>
> How good is your antenna? 112 ns is roughly 112 feet. That's not at all
> surprising if your antenna is inside or under trees.
>
Not perfect, but should be reasonably good. It's an ext
e to what goes on in mine.
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Azelio Boriani
> wrote:
>
>> Have you any reference? A TBolt, Z3801 or similar?
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Daniel Ginsburg wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
&
On 23.04.2013, at 3:02, Jim Lux wrote:
>
> Assuming the software is reading some hardware counter when it gets the
> pulse, there could be variable latency in the routine. 8000 ticks is a lot
> of instructions though..
The hw timer latches the counter value to a separate register when the le
Hi all,
I have bought a Resolution SMT GG for me to play with, and build a very simple
breakout board.
The receiver appears to be working (in a sense). That is, it powers up, it
emits valid TSIP, it was able to survey it's position - a sane one. Trimble GPS
Studio is able to recognize it, and
