Steve Rooke wrote:
> I think the reluctance to publish at
> component level is the concern that it will be set upon by a bunch of
> rabid dogs each saying pointing out "errors" in the design or
> suggestions of how it could be done much better.
A guy has to decide who his audience is.
If you ar
d OCXO to get to the performance level of either one. The 10811 is
probably the easiest thing to both identify and find. You see them selling anywhere from
$100 to $200 depending on just how patient you are.
Bob
On May 2, 2010, at 4:13 PM, ch...@yipyap.com wrote:
Bob asks a reasonable question:
W
sorry, revised with correct URL's.
ch...@yipyap.com wrote:
just for show-and-tell:
I've been disassembling the Schmomandl ND100M oscillator
block to see if I could use it. I figured, it's the bird
in hand, and once was a high quality piece of equipment
so maybe...
The physic
just for show-and-tell:
I've been disassembling the Schmomandl ND100M oscillator
block to see if I could use it. I figured, it's the bird
in hand, and once was a high quality piece of equipment
so maybe...
The physical construction is great. Lots of fine pitch
slot head machine screws. Lots
Bob asks a reasonable question:
What kind of accuracy are you trying to obtain?
Bob
I would like to end up with something that is usable
on a home electronics workbench. Something like a
Z3801. Something I can use if I ever try to do some
goofing around with microwave radio operation.
I'm
That is a really cool picture.
Can I be like you when I grow up?
I've figured out which of these silvered modules
in this Schomandl sig gen is the oscillator (the one that
got warm). I have to figure out if it is voltage adjustable
in some way.
Does anyone use mechanical adjustment with a ser
I'd like to build a GPS disciplined frequency standard.
I am slowly gathering up pieces.
I have a Trimble Resolution T GPS card that appears to work,
and an antenna for it.
I'm thinking now of the oscillator part.
I have two Racal 1992 counters with the stable oscillator option
(probably 04E