measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 1968 Scientific American Magazine: Cesium
ClockStandards
Dave I do not know why but it was one of two things as I barely recall.
Magazine format change (Need dumber for more readers) or the fellow died
On 12/10/14, 6:31 AM, Alan Melia wrote:
Hi Dave, as a long time reader (since 1955) and subscriber I remember
the Amateur scientist pages ending in the 1980s. I think the contributer
retired. At around that time I think the many adherents formed the
Society of Amateur Scientists. Though I have
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Alan Melia alan.me...@btinternet.com
wrote:
Hi Dave, as a long time reader (since 1955) and subscriber I remember the
Amateur scientist pages ending in the 1980s. I think the contributer
retired. At around that time I think the many adherents formed the Society
That link leads to Semester At Sea -- but a little googling finds
something useful: http://amasci.com/
I think the biggest loss from Scientific America was Martin Garners
Mathematics Puzzles. Everything from LISP to Conway's Game of Life...
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Jim Lux
OK now I will get into trouble.
There isn't a need for doing these types of things anymore as we are
turning into a consumer society. Shame.
Better end this thought right now because it certainly is not Time-nuts
worthy.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Jim Lux
paul.alfi...@gmail.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 1968 Scientific American Magazine: Cesium
ClockStandards
Message-ID:
cap_sgzdqymwk8dksms4bwmr6y2hgr5kxhphdn2zm5odsfxh...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text
