Re: [time-nuts] AN/URQ-10A frequency standard

2013-04-27 Thread paul swed
Gregory Well I am afraid I have become spoiled in that I use the GPS locked references these days. They consume little power or maybe about the same actually as the 10. So I also have a mix of great old oscillators. But for me at least thats what the 10 would be. I have to say that it was what star

Re: [time-nuts] AN/URQ-10A frequency standard

2013-04-27 Thread Gregory Muir
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:16:17 -0400, Paul Swed wrote: >I looked and must have hit the same site you did for the sulzer. Yes I >expect a log warmup. I used them in the navy and we never let them go >cold. circa 1973-1979. Took them to the cal lab on battery etc. I thought >maybe I would have a m

Re: [time-nuts] AN/URQ-10A frequency standard

2013-04-27 Thread paul swed
I looked and must have hit the same site you did for the sulzer. Yes I expect a log warmup. I used them in the navy and we never let them go cold. circa 1973-1979. Took them to the cal lab on battery etc. I thought maybe I would have a manual I don't. You are lucky to get one. Great reference.

Re: [time-nuts] AN/URQ-10A frequency standard

2013-04-27 Thread Gregory Muir
Thank you for you replies Dave and Paul! Well, patience won out and I left the unit on for a considerably longer time. The inner oven meter indication then started to come up off of zero after nearly seven hours. Not knowing the thermal mass it has to heat I guess I assumed that it would have