No problem, Had. Actually, there have been two or three in the last
couple of days, so you're not alone.
John
Had wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> I think that last one was my fault. It was not supposed to go to
> "time-nuts" sorry.
>
> Had, K7MLR
>
>
> At 10:19 AM 1/16/2007, you wrote:
>> I see
Hi John,
I think that last one was my fault. It was not supposed to go to
"time-nuts" sorry.
Had, K7MLR
At 10:19 AM 1/16/2007, you wrote:
>I seem to be seeing an increasing number of postings that are being
>rejected because the attachments are too big.
>
A well regulated Militia, being
I seem to be seeing an increasing number of postings that are being
rejected because the attachments are too big.
The list is set to accept non-threatening (ie, no .exe, etc. files)
attachments up to 128kb in size.
I really need to enforce that limit because now that we have about 400
subscrib
