Hello, All--
Thanks to the collective savvy of this list and the
patient assistance of Ken Winterling I was
finally able to get my Tbolt to stop requiring me
to configure the COM-4 channel every time I ran
the monitoring software.
So-- I had such good luck with that question, I'm
going to pester
ect: [time-nuts] Another Trimble Tbolt question
Hello, All--
Thanks to the collective savvy of this list and the patient assistance of
Ken Winterling I was finally able to get my Tbolt to stop requiring
me to configure the COM-4 channel every time I ran the monitoring software.
So-- I had such
ROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 5:49 AM
Subject: [time-nuts] Another Trimble Tbolt question
> Hello, All--
>
> Thanks to the collective savvy of this list and the
> patient assistance of Ken Winterling I was
> finally able to get my Tbolt to stop requiring me
&
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 5:49 AM
Subject: [time-nuts] Another Trimble Tbolt question
> Hello, All--
>
> Thanks to the collective savvy of this list and the
> patient assistance of Ken Winterling I was
> finally able to get my Tbolt to stop
From: "Darrell Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 3:19 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Another Trimble Tbolt question
>
> More guessing. I wonder if the altitude you see is fr
In a message dated 30/03/2008 07:47:57 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
My guess is that at least some of the difference that you see in your
altitude is from the propagation delay in the cable between your antenna and
the GPS module.
Guessing still further, I would think that
From: Darrell Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Another Trimble Tbolt question
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:41:36 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am not an expert.
>
> My guess is that at least some of the difference that you see in your
&
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Another Trimble Tbolt question
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:46:10 EDT
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nigel,
> I think that's all rather optimistic, as mentioned previously height
> estimation is the most innacurate parameter
On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 05:46 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -
> I think that's all rather optimistic, as mentioned previously height
> estimation is the most innacurate parameter to be reported by GPS units.
Height is about 1.6 to 1.8 times worse than horizontal po
