Hi
If you set them both on the table, the CSAC’s I’ve seen are just slightly
smaller than the NAC’s. It’s not by much. I never bothered to see if the
mechanical specs on the parts reflected this or not.
Bob
> On Apr 6, 2017, at 10:41 PM, jimlux wrote:
>
> On 4/6/17 5:11 PM, paul swed wrote:
On 4/6/17 5:11 PM, paul swed wrote:
Jim am I reading the casc power consumption correctly? .12 and .14 W.
Thats 10X lower.
Yes..
Any idea on the $$
CSAC in the several kilobuck range, NAC in the 10-20k range, I think.
They're about the same size.. NAC is slightly smaller, I think.
Regards
Hi
Yes the numbers are correct, the NAC pulls roughly 10X the power of a CSAC.
Bob
> On Apr 6, 2017, at 8:11 PM, paul swed wrote:
>
> Jim am I reading the casc power consumption correctly? .12 and .14 W.
> Thats 10X lower.
> Any idea on the $$
> Regards
> Paul
> WB8TSL
>
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017
Jim am I reading the casc power consumption correctly? .12 and .14 W.
Thats 10X lower.
Any idea on the $$
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:11 PM, jimlux wrote:
> Here's a quick summary of the datasheet performance between the
> Vectron/Accubeat NAC1 and the MicroSemi CSAC. Bear in m
Here's a quick summary of the datasheet performance between the
Vectron/Accubeat NAC1 and the MicroSemi CSAC. Bear in mind that
Microsemi now has a wider temp range (i'm using the old rev J datasheet)
CSAC is 1/10th the power
NAC1 has a better crystal, so the phase noise is better
the "atomic"
