Joseph Gray wrote:
I'd appreciate it if you stuck your request here.
http://www.drkirkby.co.uk/community/test-equipment/
I like the idea.
Thanks - it is nice to know I have not totally wasted my time, although getting to grips with bits of
perl warrants the time spent. There is nothing
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 6:46
Subject: [time-nuts] Cable Delay Measurements
For estimates of cable delay on RG-58 cable or other cable that has a
0.659 velocity factory, you can use 1.542800 nanosecond per foot.
Best to confirm it. Use your stations 1 PPS and connect
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Kirkby writes:
Joseph Gray wrote:
As you will see, someone has pointed out the spelling errors.
Unfortunately, I have never got around to getting a decent spell checker
on my UNIX box. I write my web pages in vi, which does not have a spell
checker! But I
From: David Kirkby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Cable Delay Measurements
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:29:49 +0100
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David,
Joseph Gray wrote:
Thanks, I knew that was the the basic procedure, using a T.I. counter. I
was hoping someone had a copy
For estimates of cable delay on RG-58 cable or other cable that has a
0.659 velocity factory, you can use 1.542800 nanosecond per foot.
Best to confirm it. Use your stations 1 PPS and connect it to a tee at
the start input of the time interval counter. Connect the cable under
test to the
time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 6:46
Subject: [time-nuts] Cable Delay Measurements
For estimates of cable delay on RG-58 cable or other cable that has a
0.659 velocity factory, you can use 1.542800 nanosecond per foot.
Best to confirm it. Use
