List,
While comparing oscillators at 10 GHz might work for some it is indeed a
daunting challenge at the very least.
I would like to propose what may be cheaper and more readily achieved method
for Comparing 10 MHz Oscillators by more of us time-nuts. (This is still
theoretical)
What I propo
Perry Sandeen wrote:
List,
While comparing oscillators at 10 GHz might work for some it is indeed a
daunting challenge at the very least.
I would like to propose what may be cheaper and more readily achieved method
for Comparing 10 MHz Oscillators by more of us time-nuts. (This is still
the
...@febo.com] On Behalf
Of Bruce Griffiths
Sent: martedì 11 gennaio 2011 4.10
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Comparing 10 MHz Oscillators at 10 GHz- an alternative
method?
Perry Sandeen wrote:
> List,
>
> While comparing oscillators
Of Bruce Griffiths
Sent: martedì 11 gennaio 2011 4.10
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Comparing 10 MHz Oscillators at 10 GHz- an alternative
method?
Perry Sandeen wrote:
List,
While comparing oscillators at 10 GHz might work for some it is
Hi
The normal term for a gizmo that multiplies and then mixes down is an error
multiplier. They were a very common lab item back when I had more hair than I
do now.. Various people made them in the 1950's and 1960's.
Bob
On Jan 10, 2011, at 9:35 PM, Perry Sandeen wrote:
> List,
>
> While co
