Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-16 Thread Stéphane Rey
Hi, I've took the time to read carefully your long and detailed message Magnus and this was very interesting. I've learned many things that have enabled me to investigate further. Ah yes, you're right saying that the more you fall into these things, the more you discover that you have to

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-15 Thread Mike Feher
Hi - I agree with what you stated, however, I am not sure that at real low levels they are actually discernible. Regards - Mike Mike B. Feher, EOZ Inc. 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 office 908-902-3831 cell -Original Message- From: time-nuts

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-15 Thread Didier Juges
I have a page that illustrates how you can use a delay line and a mixer to separately obtain AM and PM http://www.ko4bb.com/Timing/Phase_Detector Didier KO4BB On January 14, 2015 1:19:11 PM CST, Mike Feher mfe...@eozinc.com wrote: At those low levels, how does one differentiate between phase

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-15 Thread Mike Feher
Bob - What I am saying is, even at the levels you mentioned, what is measured is I believe the combination of phase and AM. In other words, you are just measuring noise, but, are not certain if it is all phase, or phase plus some AM. At least that is my recollection when I was heavily involved

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-15 Thread Bob Camp
Hi I guess the question becomes how low is low. If it’s a 50 ohm system If the power level is rational If you are at room temperature There are some limits on how low low can be. You have a -174 dbm / Hz thermal floor. AM or PM noise can only be 3db better than the thermal floor. At a

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-14 Thread Mike Feher
At those low levels, how does one differentiate between phase or AM noise? Thanks Regards - Mike Mike B. Feher, EOZ Inc. 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 office 908-902-3831 cell -Original Message- From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Bruce

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-14 Thread paul swed
Interestingly they use regenerative dividers. Pretty good read. Thanks Paul WB8TSL On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Tom Knox act...@hotmail.com wrote: I think the key to this concept is an optical comb filter. Archita Hati of the Phase Noise measurement Group at NIST has been researching

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-14 Thread Bob Camp
Hi More or less by definition: AM noise has the sidebands in phase, PM noise has the sidebands out of phase. PM adds to no envelope power, AM adds to the envelope power. If you have purely random noise, half of the power is AM, half is PM by this approach. If you have what is effectively a

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-14 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 01/13/2015 11:41 AM, Attila Kinali wrote: On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:09:45 + Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: Seems that the state of the art in stabilized lasers has improved a lot lately, e.g. there are

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-14 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Although the phase noise when using optical combs to generate Rf signals is low there is no mention of the am noise. Bruce On Tuesday, January 13, 2015 02:49:33 PM Tom Knox wrote: I think the key to this concept is an optical comb filter. Archita Hati of the Phase Noise measurement Group at

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-14 Thread Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
Dr David Kirkby Managing Director Kirkby Microwave Ltd Registered office: Stokes Hall Lodge, Burnham Rd, Chelmsford, Essex, CM3 6DT, United Kingdom Registered in England and Wales as company number 08914892 http://www.kirkbymicrowave.co.uk/ Tel 07910 441670 / +44 7910 441670 (0900-2100 GMT) On 13

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-13 Thread Tom Knox
I think the key to this concept is an optical comb filter. Archita Hati of the Phase Noise measurement Group at NIST has been researching ultra low phase noise 5MHz references using an optical standard and comb filter as well as extensive RF components to down converting to the desired

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-13 Thread Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
On 12 January 2015 at 12:34, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: Hi, I just stumbled over this [1] nice article by Fritz Riehle that might be of interest to others as well. Attila Kinali [1] Towards a Re-definition of the Second Based on Optical Atomic Clocks, by

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-13 Thread Jim Lux
On 1/13/15 2:41 AM, Attila Kinali wrote: On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:09:45 + Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote: One exception here is space qualified oscillators. For those you go to the JPL and ask them to help you. Actually, you want to go to Applied Physics Labs (APL).. they're the

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-13 Thread Attila Kinali
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:37:05 +0100 Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: If you use a standard laser diode, these have a linewidth of around 20-100MHz. If you provide them the slightest feedback, they go down to 1MHz easily (ie just by adding some window glass infront of the laser, that

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-13 Thread Attila Kinali
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:46:01 + Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) drkir...@kirkbymicrowave.co.uk wrote: Of course I'm not suggesting a HeNe would provide the stability of cutting edge research laser optical clock, but they are easily within the budget of a hobbyist and could be a bit

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-13 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) drkir...@kirkbymicrowave.co.uk wrote: I had a brief read. Equation 1 made me wonder what could be achieved with a cheap HeNe laser. It should be fairly easy to mix a couple of See Sams Laser Faq section on stabalized HeNe

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-13 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: I just stumbled over this [1] nice article by Fritz Riehle that might be of interest to others as well. I've seen less discussion of non-atomic stable optical oscillators. Most (all?) of these optical atomic standards are

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-13 Thread Attila Kinali
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:09:45 + Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: I just stumbled over this [1] nice article by Fritz Riehle that might be of interest to others as well. I've seen less discussion of

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-13 Thread Attila Kinali
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:46:01 + Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) drkir...@kirkbymicrowave.co.uk wrote: I had a brief read. Equation 1 made me wonder what could be achieved with a cheap HeNe laser. It should be fairly easy to mix a couple of HeNe lasers on a photodiode and look at

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-13 Thread Neville Michie
THe stability /accuracy of lasers is entirely dependent on the cavity length. Materials used are usually invar or silica, so you are no better off than with a quartz crystals. They are just a resonant cavity. cheers, Neville Michie ___ time-nuts

[time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-12 Thread Attila Kinali
Hi, I just stumbled over this [1] nice article by Fritz Riehle that might be of interest to others as well. Attila Kinali [1] Towards a Re-definition of the Second Based on Optical Atomic Clocks, by Fritz Riehle, 2015 http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.02068 -- It is upon moral

Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

2015-01-12 Thread Attila Kinali
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:34:03 +0100 Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: I just stumbled over this [1] nice article by Fritz Riehle that might be of interest to others as well. And while we are at it: 2e-18 total uncertainty in an atomic clock, by T.L. Nicholson et.al., 2015