Re: [time-nuts] FRS-C spec

2005-07-26 Thread Brian Kirby
I forgot the measurements I made a few months ago for 100 second modified Allan variance 1.17x10-12 (FRK-L timebase), second test 2.48x10-12 (Z3801A timebase), third test 2.16x10-11 (Motorola M12+ GPS RX comparison) for 1,000 second modified Allan variance 2.07x10-12 (Z3801A Timebase), second te

Re: [time-nuts] FRS-C spec

2005-07-26 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone familiar with the Efratom model FRS-C rubidium? I am trying to find out if there is a published spec for jitter on it. If it isn't available, does anyone have one of these units and knows what it typically runs on theirs? Thanks, Chuck Norton Hi Chuck -- I ha

Re: [time-nuts] FRS-C spec

2005-07-26 Thread Brian Kirby
No jitter spec, but the manual shows it should have a short term stability of less than 1x10-10 for 1 second to 100 second Allan variances. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone familiar with the Efratom model FRS-C rubidium? I am trying to find out if there is a published spec for jitter on it.

[time-nuts] FRS-C spec

2005-07-26 Thread chuck
Is anyone familiar with the Efratom model FRS-C rubidium? I am trying to find out if there is a published spec for jitter on it. If it isn't available, does anyone have one of these units and knows what it typically runs on theirs? Thanks, Chuck Norton Frequency Standards & Services 2727 E. Palme