[time-nuts] FW: Re: Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for

2010-03-25 Thread Rich Stolte
N connector would be preferable if space would accomidate the cutout being drilled to a larger size. If not, the front panel from the 5 GHZ /12 GHz counter is available from Agilent. They did not use a BNC connector past 3 GHz and I don't think you want to either. As far as the specification

Re: [time-nuts] FW: Re: Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for

2010-03-25 Thread Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
that Agilent is selling this front panel for $199 ! I think this doesn't worth that price. -Message d'origine- De : time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] De la part de Rich Stolte Envoyé : jeudi 25 mars 2010 21:12 À : time-nuts@febo.com Objet : [time-nuts] FW: Re: Low

Re: [time-nuts] FW: Re: Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for

2010-03-25 Thread John Miles
and frequency measurement' Subject: Re: [time-nuts] FW: Re: Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for BNC is definitely not an option. My standard connector for this project is a TNC connector. It's rated to 8 GHz and many adapter are available for cheap. The N connector might be an option (I can propose

Re: [time-nuts] FW: Re: Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for

2010-03-25 Thread Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
: [time-nuts] FW: Re: Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for I'd vote SMA. TNC isn't widely used on other HP/Agilent gear. -- john, KE5FX -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]on Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER Sent: Thursday, March 25

Re: [time-nuts] FW: Re: Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for

2010-03-25 Thread David C. Partridge
3.5mm Dave -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER Sent: 25 March 2010 21:02 To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' Subject: Re: [time-nuts] FW: Re: Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board

Re: [time-nuts] FW: Re: Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for

2010-03-25 Thread Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
:45 À : 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' Objet : Re: [time-nuts] FW: Re: Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for 3.5mm Dave -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER Sent: 25 March 2010 21:02

Re: [time-nuts] FW: Re: Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for

2010-03-25 Thread Bob Camp
and frequency measurement' Objet : Re: [time-nuts] FW: Re: Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for 3.5mm Dave -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER Sent: 25 March 2010 21:02 To: 'Discussion of precise

Re: [time-nuts] FW: Re: Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for

2010-03-25 Thread John Allen
- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 7:01 PM To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' Subject: Re: [time-nuts] FW: Re: Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for Too expensive. A solution

Re: [time-nuts] FW: Re: Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for

2010-03-25 Thread Arnold Tibus
: Re: [time-nuts] FW: Re: Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for I'd vote SMA. TNC isn't widely used on other HP/Agilent gear. -- john, KE5FX -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]on Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER Sent: Thursday, March