To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Frequency processing scheme of HP5065
vapourrubidium standard
--- Ulrich Bangert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John,
offset that changed annually. IIRC, it was
typically something like
300x10e-10.
Agreed
Seems very interesing!!!
If i'm right, That could lead to rubidium based
primary standards...
Normand Martel
--- Rob Kimberley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about the Rubidium Fountain?
See first article in the Autumn 2005 report at link
below.
'repeatable'?
Cheers
Ulrich
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Poul-Henning Kamp
Gesendet: Montag, 6. November 2006 14:22
An: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Betreff: Re: [time-nuts] Frequency processing
Normand Martel VE2UM wrote,
With Cesium, high end techniologies like fountains or beans
can be used
Yes, I know it's a typo and I mean no harm to Normand, but it
gives new meaning to the term bean counter. (Normally, a bean
counter is an accountant.)
Regards,
Bill Hawkins
--- Bill Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Normand Martel VE2UM wrote,
With Cesium, high end techniologies like fountains
or beans
can be used
Yes, I know it's a typo and I mean no harm to
Normand, but it
gives new meaning to the term bean counter.
(Normally, a bean
counter is an
