); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:56:57 +0200, Robert Deliën [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Personally I find this one much more impressive:
http://www.time-flow-clock.de/
That site seems to be browser-dependent. I works under IE but not
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Rex wrote:
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:56:57 +0200, Robert Deliën [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Personally I find this one much more impressive:
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Rex wrote:
That site seems to be browser-dependent. I works under IE but not
Firefox. Do others see the same behavior?
Rex, it works fine under the new mozilla version called Seamonkey. I have
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Jeffrey Pawlan wrote:
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Rex wrote:
That site seems to be browser-dependent. I works under IE but not
Firefox. Do others see the same behavior?
Rex, it
/
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Bruce Lanning
Sent: Sun 9/9/2007 16:35
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Fw: UNIQUE CLOCK
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Subject: UNIQUE CLOCK
Subject: UNIQUE CLOCK
-653-9336 DSN 633-9336
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Javier
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:04 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Fw: UNIQUE CLOCK
And much more impressive to see
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
On 9/11/07, Chuck Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amazing how little differences occur with the same browser. I use Seamonkey
V1.1.3,
under linux, and the clock does not work. But flash websites work just fine.
The
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Subject: UNIQUE CLOCK
Subject: UNIQUE CLOCK
Remember after noon its military time 1300, 1400, etc.
Here is what you will see when you look at this clock. You don't have to do
anything.
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
In a message dated 09/09/2007 15:38:13 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just look at it and study it. It gives you the EXACT TIME of the DAY in
Seconds, minutes, hours, the day, month and year. Just read
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Exact to the second here!
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 September 2007 15:47
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Fw
In a message dated 09/09/2007 15:52:55 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Exact to the second here!
Rob
Perhaps that's because your PC clock was better set than mine:-)
It was out here by a couple of seconds compared with GPS derived time so I
guessed it
Windows NTP set up.
Alternatively, Dimension 4 is a great SNTP client.
http://www.thinkman.com/dimension4/
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 September 2007 16:00
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Fw
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
On 9/9/07, Bruce Lanning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the COOLEST clock I have seen yet!!
A new one!! Look closely at it!! Amazing!! Click On the following
link:
If that Jscript isn't soaking enough of
In a message dated 09/09/2007 16:09:32 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How do you normally set your PC time?
Both my XP machines are running NTP, so no need to do any manual tweaks.
--
Hi Rob
Thanks for the information, I've been meaning to take a look at
measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Fw: UNIQUE CLOCK
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
On 9/9/07, Bruce Lanning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the COOLEST clock I have seen yet!!
A new one!! Look closely at it!! Amazing!! Click On the following
link
-nuts] Fw: UNIQUE CLOCK
On 9/9/07, Bruce Lanning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the COOLEST clock I have seen yet!!
A new one!! Look closely at it!! Amazing!! Click On
the following link:
If that Jscript isn't soaking enough of your CPU, there's always:
http
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
On 9/9/07, Didier Juges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first one was shockwave, not javascript, but it's not better and both
are CPU hogs...
Indeed...calcing and drawing the vectors for each little tooth on each
gear does not
17 matches
Mail list logo
