From: James Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GMT vs. UTC
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:31:00 -0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Magnus Danielson wrote:
>
> > I would feel more comfortable if I knew that the official time (and those
> > the
&g
James Maynard wrote:
>Magnus Danielson wrote:
>
>
>
>>I would feel more comfortable if I knew that the official time (and those the
>>legal time) would be some 1h multiple of UTC and that this 1h multiple is
>>precisely defined for normal and summer time.
>>
>>
>
>It all depends on your loc
Magnus Danielson wrote:
> I would feel more comfortable if I knew that the official time (and those the
> legal time) would be some 1h multiple of UTC and that this 1h multiple is
> precisely defined for normal and summer time.
It all depends on your local time zone. Not all time zones are offs
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bill Hawkins" writes:
>The WSJ says that the UK still uses GMT. When the NASA person
>called out "On my mark..." time during pre-launch activities,
>it was specified as GMT.
>
>What relationship does GMT have to UTx time? The hill in Greenwich
>is now just a museum,
At 07:56 PM 7/29/2005, Brian Kirby wrote...
>GMT = UTC. A lot of old school folks in the Military and NASA were schooled
>as GMT or ZULU time for UTC.
GMT is actually ambiguous, and in actual use can refer to either UTC or UT1. It
predates UTC, and was used prior to the introduction of UTC. Her
GMT = UTC. A lot of old school folks in the Military and NASA were
schooled as GMT or ZULU time for UTC.
Bill Hawkins wrote:
The WSJ says that the UK still uses GMT. When the NASA person
called out "On my mark..." time during pre-launch activities,
it was specified as GMT.
What relationship
The WSJ says that the UK still uses GMT. When the NASA person
called out "On my mark..." time during pre-launch activities,
it was specified as GMT.
What relationship does GMT have to UTx time? The hill in Greenwich
is now just a museum, right?
Bill Hawkins
__
