); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
A friend of me has just acquired a HP 107BR frequency standard and is
looking for doc's.
Is there anyone on this list who knows where to find an electronic copy
of this manual?
Best regards,
Stijn Nestra
___
Gents,
I have a question about a HP 107BR that I have.
It is marked at the front panel with: specif. H40 107BR
I do have the manual, but it states nothing about specif. H40
Does anybody on this list have a clue about this special specification?
Stijn
List,
I bought the HP 107BR from ebay. It arrived very well packed and is as new on
the inside and 9.5/10 on the exterior. It requires a special A/N connector for
the AC power.
I also bought the Artek CD and D/L rhe manual from the K4OOB site. I
discovered that my model is of a later revision
Found a cosmetically nice HP 107BR on eBay right now.
Hewlett Packard HP 107BR Quartz Oscillator Vintage
Cheers,
Corby
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and f
Perrier pse can you give your email to have a direct contact?
Luciano
tim...@timeok.it
Da "time-nuts" time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
A "time-nuts@febo.com" time-nuts@febo.com
Cc
Data Wed, 28 Feb 2018 02:51:48 +0000 (UTC)
Oggetto [time-nuts] HP 107BR FS
List,
In getting documentation together for my HP 107BR I discovered the manuals I
was able to aquire were for prefix 333.
My unit prefix is 708. Does anyone have that prefix schematics or an errata
sheet? Or does the 708 prefix just designate another factory run?
TIA
Perrier
__
Perrier
The manual we offer on our WEB site is centered on serial Prefix 512
with change sheets up to serial prefix 708. There are several changes,
between the 512 and 708, different configuration of the A1Y1 , Coax
changes, Powers Supply changes. Many many changes in circuit details
between
Hi
The oscillators were tested and sorted at the end of the manufacturing line.
Everything got
checked for aging. It’s not clear that everything got detail tested for ADEV.
The suspicion is that
they did enough ADEV to get the few tight(er) spec units they needed.
Next layer is that these tes
