Re: [time-nuts] Interesting Patent

2006-07-14 Thread Dave Brown
://www.hparchive.com/ DaveB, NZ - Original Message - From: "Stan Searing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'" Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 6:04 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Interesting Patent > Hi Dave and the re

Re: [time-nuts] Interesting Patent

2006-07-13 Thread Stan Searing
of standards, clocks and DVM's from the good old days. Cheers, Stan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Brown Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 2:32 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Inte

Re: [time-nuts] Interesting Patent

2006-05-17 Thread Normand Martel
Hi... I remember having seen an interesting analog counter/frequency divider using charge pumps and unijunction transistors in a watchmaker's mechanical watch adjusting machine. ( i don't remember the machine's name, but it is used to adjust the oscillator's (balance wheel/hairspring) frequency.

Re: [time-nuts] Interesting Patent

2006-05-17 Thread John Day
Good suggestion Dave. It would be nice just to see some of that gear again! Of course, you need a darned good air conditioner if you are going to use any of it. John At 05:31 PM 5/16/2006, you wrote: >Looking to get good colour photos of some of these older HP counters >(and similar offerings

Re: [time-nuts] Interesting Patent

2006-05-17 Thread John Day
> >No, I have a HP 521C which comes with the HP 521A-59B crystal >oscillator plugin >module, but the HP 521A has it as an option. The HP 521C also have an >additional counting row and an additional step in the timebase. >Actually, you can supply it with an external time base of any of the >freque

Re: [time-nuts] Interesting Patent

2006-05-16 Thread Dave Brown
Looking to get good colour photos of some of these older HP counters (and similar offerings from other manufacturers) in the pre/early Nixie etc period. If you have anything available would appreciate direct email of same. Thanks Dave Brown, NZ -- No virus found in this outgoing message.

Re: [time-nuts] Interesting Patent

2006-05-16 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: John Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Interesting Patent Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:33:58 -0400 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >Hmm... strange... these applications are no match for the Phantastron > >divider, > >which Frederi

Re: [time-nuts] Interesting Patent

2006-05-16 Thread John Day
> >Hmm... strange... these applications are no match for the Phantastron divider, >which Frederic Calland Williams invented in 1941. It did 1/5, 1/6 or 1/10 with >a triode and a diode if memory serves me right. My oldest HP counter is >virtually loaded with it, and it has a nice trimmer in the bac

Re: [time-nuts] Interesting Patent

2006-05-16 Thread Brooke Clarke
Hi Scott: I got burned by using the then free IBM patent data base as the basis of all the links on my web pages. But when that got sold and became a commercial operation all my links died, so now I only link to the USPTO and have also learned that you can NOT just cut and paste URLs since th

Re: [time-nuts] Interesting Patent

2006-05-16 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: Brooke Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [time-nuts] Interesting Patent Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:20:11 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi: > > I came across a 1946 patent for a vacuum tube based counter circuit that > will divide 60 Hz down to 1 Hz.

Re: [time-nuts] Interesting Patent

2006-05-16 Thread David Forbes
Brooke Clarke wrote: > Hi: > > I came across a 1946 patent for a vacuum tube based counter circuit that > will divide 60 Hz down to 1 Hz. It's interesting in that there's a > discussion about the advantage of using binary instead of base 10 and > also about using feedback to change the scale

Re: [time-nuts] Interesting Patent

2006-05-16 Thread Lee Horton
From: "Scott Newell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 1:30 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Interesting Patent > At 11:20 AM 5/16/2006 , Brooke Clarke wrote: >>Hi: >> >>I came acros

Re: [time-nuts] Interesting Patent

2006-05-16 Thread Scott Newell
At 11:20 AM 5/16/2006 , Brooke Clarke wrote: >Hi: > >I came across a 1946 patent for a vacuum tube based counter circuit that >will divide 60 Hz down to 1 Hz. It's interesting in that there's a >discussion about the advantage of using binary instead of base 10 and >also about using feedback to

[time-nuts] Interesting Patent

2006-05-16 Thread Brooke Clarke
Hi: I came across a 1946 patent for a vacuum tube based counter circuit that will divide 60 Hz down to 1 Hz. It's interesting in that there's a discussion about the advantage of using binary instead of base 10 and also about using feedback to change the scale of the counter from 64 to 60 (or