on, 16/11/09, John Green wrote:
From: John Green
Subject: [time-nuts] Jamming GPS
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Date: Monday, 16 November, 2009, 15:17
All the discussion regarding jamming GPS has been very interesting. Because
it is spread spectrum, I always assumed it would be difficult to jam GPS
For testing, I would suggest using a directional coupler in the antenna lead to
reduce the chances for unwanted radiation.
John WA4WDL
John Green wrote:
> All the discussion regarding jamming GPS has been very interesting. Because
> it is spread spectrum, I always assumed it would be dif
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:20:25AM -0500, ewkeh...@aol.com wrote:
> Having followed the discussions on GPS jamming I have to question if this
> is a safe forum for such open info. In the wrong hands it allows the wrong
> people to cause serious problems. Bert Kehren
There have been pu
In message , John
Green writes:
>Any suggestions as to the most effective modulation type to try?
Pseudo-random 50Hz FSK ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute t
Hi,
for nonmilitary GNSS receiver, you do not need a wide band signal for jamming.
You only need a carrier with a signal power, sufficient to screw down the
AGC in the GNSS receiver's front end.
... and as a purpose for a military jamming exercise ... think of the
successfull detection of a jamme
.@aol.com
Sent: Mon 11/16/2009 10:20 AM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Jamming GPS
Having followed the discussions on GPS jamming I have to question if this
is a safe forum for such open info. In the wrong hands it allows the wrong
people to cause serious problems. Bert Keh
Having followed the discussions on GPS jamming I have to question if this
is a safe forum for such open info. In the wrong hands it allows the wrong
people to cause serious problems. Bert Kehren
In a message dated 11/16/2009 10:18:39 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
wpxs...@gmail.com writes:
On 11/16/09 7:17 AM, "John Green" wrote:
> All the discussion regarding jamming GPS has been very interesting. Because
> it is spread spectrum, I always assumed it would be difficult to jam GPS.
> The Monterey Bay incident indicates that it is extremely easy to jam GPS.
> So, as soon as anothe
All the discussion regarding jamming GPS has been very interesting. Because
it is spread spectrum, I always assumed it would be difficult to jam GPS.
The Monterey Bay incident indicates that it is extremely easy to jam GPS.
So, as soon as another project is out of the way, I intend to do some
exper