On Dec 12, 2014, at 12:28 AM, Charles Steinmetz csteinm...@yandex.com wrote:
Bob wrote:
Separate from the analysis of the voltage on the OCXO, there is another part
to this:
Ok, so why am I harping on the need for all this from a system standpoint ?
We've been around this track a
I grew up in an industry where we called everything that was way
overspec'ed, platinum-iridium xxx.
I think there is a broad interest in e.g. low-tempco engineering or
low-noise regulators and having some in the pocket designs that start with
jellybean discrete parts and occasional hi-spec parts
On 12/12/14, 5:09 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
———
Are we really that far apart - not really. We each are talking about
two sides of the same coin. The real world is a messy place. Analysis
often takes a back seat to the “fun of doing something”. That’s not
to say it should though …
And sometimes,
Hi
On Dec 12, 2014, at 8:52 AM, Tim Shoppa tsho...@gmail.com wrote:
I grew up in an industry where we called everything that was way
overspec'ed, platinum-iridium xxx.
I think there is a broad interest in e.g. low-tempco engineering or
low-noise regulators and having some in the pocket
Hi
Separate from the analysis of the voltage on the OCXO, there is another part to
this:
Ok, so why am I harping on the “need” for all this from a system standpoint ?
1) Adding stuff to a design that does not make it measurably better is simply a
waste of money. That’s ok if it’s your money.
: Thursday, December 11, 2014 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Linear voltage regulator hints... -- WHY?
Bob wrote:
Separate from the analysis of the voltage on the OCXO, there is
another part to this:
Ok, so why am I harping on the need for all this from a system standpoint ?
We've been around
Bob wrote:
Separate from the analysis of the voltage on the OCXO, there is
another part to this:
Ok, so why am I harping on the need for all this from a system standpoint ?
We've been around this track a time or two before, me frustrated with
your make it just good enough philosophy and you
