Re: [time-nuts] Low noise PLL for transceiver locking

francesco messineo wrote: Hi Murray, On 2/2/10, Murray Greenman wrote: Frank, My suggestion would be to try injection locking, rather than a PLL. No change is made to the 22MHz and 42MHz oscillators, except to find a way to inject enough reference power to force them to lock to it.

Re: [time-nuts] Low noise PLL for transceiver locking

Hi Murray, On 2/2/10, Murray Greenman wrote: > Frank, > > My suggestion would be to try injection locking, rather than a PLL. No > change is made to the 22MHz and 42MHz oscillators, except to find a way > to inject enough reference power to force them to lock to it. Injection > locking works

Re: [time-nuts] Low noise PLL for transceiver locking

Hi Murray, On 2/2/10, Murray Greenman wrote: > Frank, > > My suggestion would be to try injection locking, rather than a PLL. No > change is made to the 22MHz and 42MHz oscillators, except to find a way > to inject enough reference power to force them to lock to it. Injection > locking works

[time-nuts] Low noise PLL for transceiver locking

Frank, My suggestion would be to try injection locking, rather than a PLL. No change is made to the 22MHz and 42MHz oscillators, except to find a way to inject enough reference power to force them to lock to it. Injection locking works well with modest harmonic relationships, and gives good noise