On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 20:57:51 -0600, "Bill Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Have we settled the question of whether or not the RB can
>be dominated (no, that's not it) disciplined by an external
>1 PPS or 10 MHz signal?
>
>If it can, I'd load up on Rb units and discipline them with
>a modern GPS
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 08:57:51PM -0600, Bill Hawkins wrote:
> Have we settled the question of whether or not the RB can
> be dominated (no, that's not it) disciplined by an external
> 1 PPS or 10 MHz signal?
Settled is vastly too strong a word in my case, but I am
currently pretty positi
Have we settled the question of whether or not the RB can
be dominated (no, that's not it) disciplined by an external
1 PPS or 10 MHz signal?
If it can, I'd load up on Rb units and discipline them with
a modern GPS receiver - or maybe replace the OXCO in Z3801s.
Bill Hawkins
Z3801s do dissipate
If you get the Rb unit by itself, all you have is an Rb oscillator; it
depends on the XO unit for GPS. So, if I were to get only one, I'd get
the XO.
John
Richard W. Solomon said the following on 02/01/2007 05:47 PM:
> If you had a choice between the Rb unit and the XO unit, which would you
If you had a choice between the Rb unit and the XO unit, which would you
pick ?
I am told the Rb units have a design life of 10 years and I don't know how
old
the e-Bay units are, but is it better than the XO units ?
Decisions, decisions. Which one to get.
Thanks for any advice.
73, Dick, W1KSZ
