); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
On 9/21/07, Didier Juges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are entering an era of "Trusted Computing", which means that Microsoft
> and it's DRM friends trust that you can only do what they expressly allow
> you to do on your com
ber 21, 2007 5:10 AM
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] M$-Vi$ta-compliant PC RTC clock card?
>
>
> > It is also possible that some older software or hardware will NEVER
> > work with Vista because of choices Microsoft ma
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
> It is also possible that some older software or hardware will NEVER work
> with Vista because of choices Microsoft made in developing the new
> platform.
http://www.badvista.org
"What's wrong with Microsoft Windows Vista?"
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
> One factor to remember about good ol' PCs is that not all of the
> timing problem is down to the RTC. A lot of timing errors are down to
> Interrupts. A busy PC can lose 100s of milliseconds a day as a result
> of Interrupt a
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
You never said what your system hardware was, Intel has been making PCs for
several decades now.
With the newer systems there is so much dynamic throttling of components
that issues like this are bound to arise. Replacing the c
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Maggie Leber
Sent: 20 September 2007 16:02
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] M$-Vi$ta-compliant PC RTC clock card?
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
On 9/19/07, Jam
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
On 9/19/07, James Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (I know that some on this list will say, "You nitwit, you should be another OS
> than M$ Vista." Such replies will not be helpful to me.)
Sadly, if you wish to have direct
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
In a message dated 20/09/2007 12:28:40 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Nigel,
The ClockBlock is more suited to the main processor clock as it's only
specified down to a few hundred kilohertz. It would be O
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 September 2007 11:49
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] M$-Vi$ta-compliant PC RTC clock card?
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
In a message dated 20/09/2007 08:24:1
11:49
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] M$-Vi$ta-compliant PC RTC clock card?
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
In a message dated 20/09/2007 08:24:18 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Being a hardware kind of guy, my approach wo
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
In a message dated 20/09/2007 08:24:18 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Being a hardware kind of guy, my approach would be a little different.
Why not remove the 32.768kHz crystal and feed the existing RTC wit
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
You don't even have to remove the crystal, just clip on a wire
with a reasonably strong 32KHz signal and everything will lock
on.
-Chuck Harris
Robert Atkinson wrote:
> ); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
> Errors-To: [EMAIL PR
a market here.
Robert G8RPI.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of James Maynard
Sent: 20 September 2007 01:03
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [time-nuts] M$-Vi$ta-compliant PC RTC clock card
let me stop
> Or pause that service.
>
> Jim K7KK
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Joseph Gray
> Sent: Wednesday, 2007 September 19 18:12
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subje
Jim K7KK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joseph Gray
Sent: Wednesday, 2007 September 19 18:12
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] M$-Vi$ta-compliant PC RTC clock card?
I don't remember the p
ember 19, 2007 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] M$-Vi$ta-compliant PC RTC clock card?
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Maynard
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 7:03 PM
>> To: tim
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [time-nuts] M$-Vi$ta-compliant PC RTC clock card?
>
>...
> (I know that some on this list will say, "You nitwit, you
> should be another OS than M$ Vista." Such replies will not be
> helpful to me.)
>
> James Maynard, K7KK
> Sal
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
> I have installed Rick Hambly's TAC32+ software. That software tells me
> that my motherboard's own Real Time Clock (RTC) is truly horrible: it
> drifts at a rate of about 5000 microseconds per second and is
> unstable, too. I
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
I have been assembling my own PC, using an Intel motherboard and MS Vista
operating system. I want to use it in my local time-nuts hobby of comparing
comparing the performance of various oscillators and clocks.
I have installed
19 matches
Mail list logo
