Hi Lee,
no, I havent seen it jump like that. Loran is pretty innaccurate, I think you
will be pleased with the improvement you can get from the M12M. They are
just great little buggers.
Just make sure to turn the M12M TRAIM on, and set the limit to 100ns or so
(it's 1000ns by default I think)
2100T because I have used to 2 PRS10s and they both do
it. I hope GPS works better. Any experience like that using the PRS10
with a GPS?
Regards,
Lee
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2006 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] M12M Re
Hi Lee,
sorry, forgot to mention, I used both an M12+ and an M12M to do this, no big
difference between the two receivers.
The M12M has better short term stability (less thermal sensitivity) which
doesen't matter with a 7 hour averaging, and better RF sensitivity.
bye,
Said
__
Hi there Lee,
I am doing that right now. Attached see an ADEV plot of the PRS10
disciplined by an M12+.
My experience is that:
1) the PRS10 unit I have generates a 1PPS output which is about 35-40ns
too early on average when compared to the 1PPS input from the GPS. I think
this offse
Anyone use the new M12M to discipline a PRS10 Rb Standard?
I have a PRS10 and looking for someone who has disciplined this unit
with GPS. Tell me your experiences.
Lee W5IAV
___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ma
