What objections are there to Yahoo Groups?
They won't let me see any message bodies unless I accept their cookies. I'm
not sure what happens next if I jump through that hoop.
I'm happy to sign-up/register/whatever if I want to sent/post something. I'm
not willing to do much to read what
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
I have my own email-lists on my own server... if someone asked me to set
the list up, I would just do it.
Cheers,
Magnus
AND
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:50 PM, John Miles jmi...@pop.net wrote:
What
Hal Murray wrote:
Google didn't do anything to usenet. They did provide a web based
interface into usenet, and bought the dejanews archive of all
non-binary groups.
Google didn't do anything is the key part. In particular, they didn't do
anything when spammers discovered another free
Eric Fort wrote:
My objection to yahoo groups is they require you to be a member of yahoo
giving out all mannor of personal information just so you can access the
group archives using some funky interface they provide.
They do not! They ask for information, but they do nothing to verify
Firefox Tools-Clear Personal Data... You can even set it up to
ask you to clear personal data when you close the browser and when you
start
Firefox also has add-ins like ghost and UserAgent to allow you to
watch as you are being tracked by Google (through JavaScript)... Even
At 01:40 PM 4/14/2009, Luis Cupido wrote:
I believe it is to be ham or hobby oriented
Am I right ?
(If so some rewording of the list purpose
might be adequate... thinking out loud...)
The description does say:
Focus includes but isn't limited to amateur radio and metrology applications.
So I
... for those who would like to participate in HDL discussions that aren't
on-topic for existing lists:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HDLTalk
Any VHDL or Verilog HDL-related topics are welcome.
To keep spammers away, new member signups require moderator approval. For
this reason, please
At 12:29 PM 4/14/2009 , John Miles wrote:
... for those who would like to participate in HDL discussions that aren't
on-topic for existing lists:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HDLTalk
Any VHDL or Verilog HDL-related topics are welcome.
How will this compare to comp.lang.verilog, comp.lang.vhdl,
I believe it is to be ham or hobby oriented
Am I right ?
(If so some rewording of the list purpose
might be adequate... thinking out loud...)
Luis Cupido
ct1dmk.
Scott Newell wrote:
At 12:29 PM 4/14/2009 , John Miles wrote:
... for those who would like to participate in HDL discussions that
At 12:29 PM 4/14/2009 , John Miles wrote:
... for those who would like to participate in HDL discussions
that aren't
on-topic for existing lists:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HDLTalk
Any VHDL or Verilog HDL-related topics are welcome.
How will this compare to comp.lang.verilog,
John Miles jmi...@pop.net wrote:
Not everybody can stomach Google's perversion of Usenet (which admittedly
was no small engineering feat in itself).
Aren't there still non-Google ways of accessing Usenet?
MS
___
time-nuts mailing list --
Michael Sokolov skrev:
John Miles jmi...@pop.net wrote:
Not everybody can stomach Google's perversion of Usenet (which admittedly
was no small engineering feat in itself).
Aren't there still non-Google ways of accessing Usenet?
There is. Find the Wikipedia page for Usenet to find several
John Miles wrote:
At 12:29 PM 4/14/2009 , John Miles wrote:
... for those who would like to participate in HDL discussions
that aren't
on-topic for existing lists:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HDLTalk
Any VHDL or Verilog HDL-related topics are welcome.
How will this compare to
Michael Sokolov skrev:
John Miles jmi...@pop.net wrote:
Not everybody can stomach Google's perversion of Usenet (which
admittedly
was no small engineering feat in itself).
Aren't there still non-Google ways of accessing Usenet?
There is. Find the Wikipedia page for Usenet to find
Google didn't do anything to usenet. They did provide a web based
interface into usenet, and bought the dejanews archive of all
non-binary groups.
If you were a hardcore DejaNews user, as I was, you were probably not very
happy with the way Google handled the archive and its user interface.
I was a hardcore dajanews user. I guess that I even know it by
that name would indicate that I was around back then.
Google wrecked dejanews in the spirit of political correctness,
the nanny state, and trying to pretend that usenet is just a part
of google groups. Erasing all of the email
Chuck Harris cfhar...@erols.com wrote:
Google wrecked dejanews in the spirit of political correctness,
the nanny state, and trying to pretend that usenet is just a part
of google groups. Erasing all of the email addresses, and other things.
Does anyone know exactly where (building, city,
17 matches
Mail list logo
