Re: [time-nuts] Oooold GPS receiver discussions Austron 2201 as an xample

2015-11-12 Thread paul swed
Charles I agree with what needs to be looked at first and thats the downconverter. Its really a starlink GPS receiver that I tapped the RF off of and upconverted to 75.42 Mhz for the 2201. The startlink is driven and controlled from the corrected 10 Mhz 2201signal that would have gone to the origin

Re: [time-nuts] Oooold GPS receiver discussions Austron 2201 as an xample

2015-11-11 Thread Charles Steinmetz
Paul wrote: Indeed the almanac seems to be the problem. I can see what it thinks should be in view. Its not been easy to backout if the satelliets are behind or in the future. My time mis-alignment even though the closks correct within 1 second and the same for my location accuracy. I can manual

Re: [time-nuts] Oooold GPS receiver discussions Austron 2201 as an xample

2015-11-11 Thread paul swed
Magnus Indeed the almanac seems to be the problem. I can see what it thinks should be in view. Its not been easy to backout if the satelliets are behind or in the future. My time mis-alignment even though the closks correct within 1 second and the same for my location accuracy. I can manually tell

Re: [time-nuts] Oooold GPS receiver discussions Austron 2201 as an xample

2015-11-10 Thread Magnus Danielson
Paul, On 11/10/2015 08:58 PM, paul swed wrote: There is a good discussion about old GPS receivers that have been running. Its the NAVSTAR proteus thread. Very good details in that thread about some issues. Such as the 1024 week rollover and that the receiver should still keep working. Though the

[time-nuts] Oooold GPS receiver discussions Austron 2201 as an xample

2015-11-10 Thread paul swed
There is a good discussion about old GPS receivers that have been running. Its the NAVSTAR proteus thread. Very good details in that thread about some issues. Such as the 1024 week rollover and that the receiver should still keep working. Though the date and time would be wrong. Given that theory I