Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-05-04 Thread Michael Wouters
Not stable enough unfortunately. An ageing rate of a few parts in 10^12 per day is typical, which translates to 100 ns. You could be brave and model that as linear frequency drift to predict the time offset to the required 0.5 ns or so but I suspect that it could be a very frustrating exercise. We

Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-30 Thread Ilia Platone
I found only preliminary data about these transceivers. I was meaning for a <2000€ overall solution, does a White Rabbit implementation fill this requisite ( I couldn't find much information about its costs)? Also consider that nodes could be more than three also. Ilia. Il 30/04/2016 12:27

Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-30 Thread Bruce Griffiths
There are synchronous free space optical gigabit ethernet links available, it shouldn't take too much to modify one for White Rabbit. Bruce On Saturday, 30 April 2016 10:13 PM, Magnus Danielson wrote: Hi, On 04/29/2016 11:45 PM, Michael Wouters wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 6:14 A

Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-30 Thread Javier Serrano
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Bruce Griffiths wrote: > So far I haven't found an existing free space optical implementation of White > Rabbit. There are two groups working on that subject that I know of: Jean-Pierre Aubry [1] and his colleagues in EPFL (Neuchâtel campus, in Switzerland). The

Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-30 Thread Magnus Danielson
The free-space implementation of White Rabbit remains to be done. If you can modulate optical GE over your optical links, then it should work out fairly well. Actually, if you get that working, I'm sure they would enjoy seeing a paper on that in EFTF. Cheers, Magnus On 04/30/2016 08:06 AM,

Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-30 Thread Magnus Danielson
Hi, On 04/29/2016 11:45 PM, Michael Wouters wrote: On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Magnus Danielson wrote: Well, giving the conditions mentioned, doing ranging codes such as those used by GPS is very easy and cheap. Doing this in bidirectional isn't too hard. Doing a suitably high chip-rate s

Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-30 Thread Michael Wouters
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Magnus Danielson wrote: > Well, giving the conditions mentioned, doing ranging codes such as those > used by GPS is very easy and cheap. Doing this in bidirectional isn't too > hard. Doing a suitably high chip-rate should cost very little. I've done two-way time-t

Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-30 Thread Bruce Griffiths
White Rabbit would be good in that a suitable TDC design with 1ns resolution already exists for White Rabbit. This TDC is used in the Tunka valley (near lake Baikal) Siberian Cherenkov telescope array. Note this TDC uses the SERDES receiver in the FPGA to implement a serial to parallel converter

Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-29 Thread Michael Wouters
So why not do White Rabbit free space ? Cheers Michael On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Paul Boven wrote: > Hi everyone, > > On 04/29/2016 03:28 PM, Magnus Danielson wrote: >> >> Phase/time transfer over fiber is shaping up, but White Rabbit is >> starting to grow up and more reports for long di

Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-29 Thread Bruce Griffiths
On Friday, April 29, 2016 10:14:11 PM Magnus Danielson wrote: > Well, giving the conditions mentioned, doing ranging codes such as those > used by GPS is very easy and cheap. Doing this in bidirectional isn't > too hard. Doing a suitably high chip-rate should cost very little. > > The two-way time

Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-29 Thread Ilia Platone
Fiber is not what I need because the system will not be in fixed locations, and distances will be far more than 2km. The requirements are to record photon arrival timestamps with a sampling clock of 400MHz, 2.5ns resolution. The two clocks are independent, and the timestamps will be the effect

Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-29 Thread Magnus Danielson
Well, giving the conditions mentioned, doing ranging codes such as those used by GPS is very easy and cheap. Doing this in bidirectional isn't too hard. Doing a suitably high chip-rate should cost very little. The two-way time-transfer is relatively easy, but you will need to do some calibrati

Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-29 Thread Ilia Platone
There is line of sight. The budget is around 2k€ by now, but can be increased. This project is for an amateur astro club, and the resources they would give to me are limited, except the place where to do this and some optics. The setup must be mobile, I mean that I should be able to place the

Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-29 Thread Paul Boven
Hi everyone, On 04/29/2016 03:28 PM, Magnus Danielson wrote: Phase/time transfer over fiber is shaping up, but White Rabbit is starting to grow up and more reports for long distances is showing up. ETFT is one of the placces to check for reports. And the White Rabbit workshops, with the presen

Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-29 Thread Magnus Danielson
Bruce Griffiths wrote: Subject: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency To: "Discussion of Precise Time and Frequency Measurement" Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 10:18 PM Quoting Michael Wouters: "According to this, http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publicati

Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-29 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Not so, the common time base doesnt ,in this case , have to have hydrogen maser or better stability as long as the realisations of this timebase at each telescope track sufficiently closely within 100 ps or so is adequate for a 1ns arrival time stamp quantisation. Just as one can measure the P

Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-29 Thread Bob Stewart
-- On Thu, 4/28/16, Bruce Griffiths wrote: Subject: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency To: "Discussion of Precise Time and Frequency Measurement" Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 10:18 PM Quoting Michael Wouters: "According to this, http://www.nist.gov/ma

Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-29 Thread Azelio Boriani
Yes, but I see that the allan deviation figures they cite aren't achievable with common time-nuts gear now. Considering a VLBI project: first premium stability then superb time transfer. On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Bruce Griffiths wrote: > Quoting Michael Wouters: "According to this, > > htt

Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-29 Thread Michael Wouters
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Bruce Griffiths wrote: > Quoting Michael Wouters: "According to this, > > http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=912449 > > there are many practical challenges with a one way free-space optical link." > That paper indicates that one way tran

Re: [time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-29 Thread Bruce Griffiths
There's more relevant data on optical free space time and frequency transfer here:http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=915083 Bruce On Friday, 29 April 2016 4:01 PM, Bruce Griffiths wrote: Quoting Michael Wouters: "According to this, http://www.nist.gov/manu

[time-nuts] Optical transfer of time and frequency

2016-04-28 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Quoting Michael Wouters: "According to this, http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=912449 there are many practical challenges  with a one way free-space optical link." That paper indicates that  one way transfer with noise of a few picosec should be feasible using an IR la