[time-nuts] PLL chip? (was 10 MHz Oscillator comparison part II)

I'm in need of a PLL too. Is there a common part that is better than the 4046? I assume there must be.Not for high precision work. > Wrote:< Using the CD4046 (or HC4046) as the phase locked oscillator would > probably be counterproductive as its phase noise is very high (its in effect > an

Re: [time-nuts] PLL chip? (was 10 MHz Oscillator comparison part II)

Chris Albertson Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 7:11 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: [time-nuts] PLL chip? (was 10 MHz Oscillator comparison part II) I'm in need of a PLL too. Is there a common part that is better than the 4046? I assume there must be.No