I'm in need of a PLL too. Is there a common part that is better than
the 4046? I assume there must be.Not for high precision work.
> Wrote:< Using the CD4046 (or HC4046) as the phase locked oscillator would
> probably be counterproductive as its phase noise is very high (its in effect
> an
Chris Albertson
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 7:11 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: [time-nuts] PLL chip? (was 10 MHz Oscillator comparison part II)
I'm in need of a PLL too. Is there a common part that is better than
the 4046? I assume there must be.No