Bob,
The single-shot does not improve, it's 500 ps, but the averaging of N
samples give you that result. The 53131 does similar tricks.
Cheers,
Magnus
On 11/17/2015 02:27 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
At leas on the spec sheet I found, both counters have a single shot of 500 ps.
The
6680 “improve
5371a is a TI analyzer The time pod itself is used for paying work so it's
not available for time nuttery.
Content by Scott
Typos by Siri
> On Nov 16, 2015, at 6:20 AM, Chris Caudle wrote:
>
>> On Mon, November 16, 2015 12:42 am, Scott McGrath wrote:
>> More of a slip as I've noted I have
Hi
At leas on the spec sheet I found, both counters have a single shot of 500 ps.
The
6680 “improves” as the averaging goes up.
http://isurplus.com.au/specifications/Philips%20PM6680%20Specifications.pdf
Section 13-8 has a lot of “500 ps / sqrt(N)" in it. If N=1 (single shot) you
get 500 ps.
Hi,
PM6681's turn up at quite a good price too, and you get a lot of
extras over the 6680 - does anyone know if Timelab will work with a
6681?
Angus.
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 15:10:42 -0800, you wrote:
>Thanks Bob
>
>I'm using the actual time pod for paying activities. This would be a counter
>f
On Mon, November 16, 2015 12:42 am, Scott McGrath wrote:
> More of a slip as I've noted I have a time pod for work but I'd like to
> add a small counter for time nuttery as power is not cheap in NE so
> running the 5371A for long runs can get expensive
I don't follow. Why would you not use the Ti
Why would you want to use a 150 ps 53131 instead of a counter/timer like
the Agilent/Keysight 53230A that provides 20 ps resolution? The TimePod
my have better noise specs but it is a really dedicated, specific-use
device.
Larry
On 11/15/2015 10:42 PM, Scott McGrath wrote:
More of a slip as
More of a slip as I've noted I have a time pod for work but I'd like to add a
small counter for time nuttery as power is not cheap in NE so running the 5371A
for long runs can get expensive
Content by Scott
Typos by Siri
> On Nov 15, 2015, at 4:08 PM, Chris Caudle wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Novembe
Thanks Bob
I'm using the actual time pod for paying activities. This would be a counter
for time nuttery using the time pod software. In those cases Where I don't
want to fire up the 5071.
I'm familiar with the Keysight counters and I have a lot of them into the high
Ghz ranges
The 53131
On Sun, November 15, 2015 3:59 pm, Bob Camp wrote:
> I guess the first question would be - If you have a Time Pod, what do you
> need a counter for?
Or was the original question a slip, and was supposed to be which counter
is good for use with TimeLab software?
--
Chris Caudle
Hi
I guess the first question would be - If you have a Time Pod, what do you need
a counter for?
Based on a guess that you need extended frequency range, either would do pretty
well. My vote
would go to the HP for a couple of reasons:
1) It’s more broadly supported in terms of driver software
Hi
Which counter would be best for use with time pod I have a chance to buy each
at a reasonable prices i.e. < 1000 US
Thanks in advance Scott
Content by Scott
Typos by Siri
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https:
11 matches
Mail list logo
