On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 11:53:18 +1200, Dr Bruce Griffiths wrote:
>Bill Beam wrote:
>> Mike,
>>
>> I was afraid someone would say 'Riemann tensor'
>> The problem with the Riemann tensor is that I don't
>> think that anyone here can write in down in detail
>> for this problem (let alone solve it). I s
Bill Beam wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I was afraid someone would say 'Riemann tensor'
> The problem with the Riemann tensor is that I don't
> think that anyone here can write in down in detail
> for this problem (let alone solve it). I surely can not.
>
> I also don't think that anyone here is ready for th
Mike,
I was afraid someone would say 'Riemann tensor'
The problem with the Riemann tensor is that I don't
think that anyone here can write in down in detail
for this problem (let alone solve it). I surely can not.
I also don't think that anyone here is ready for the
idea that there is no such th
Dear Dr. Bruce and Bill B and all timenuts in this thread. My two cents
about the
conundrums and how physicists think about atomic clocks in geodesy
around the earth.
For each mass in space, whatever its orbit, if there are no other
fields (ex: electric/magnetic or drag forces) acting on it,
