This is very interesting: I think you have a precision local clock source
to accept a slowly varying input frequency and "clean" it for the
transmission so that it is the clock source that ultimately dominates the
output stability.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
> On 3/12/12 2:2
On 3/12/12 2:20 AM, Azelio Boriani wrote:
Yes, build three and compare them but your comparator has to have a very
low noise floor. I think that in addition to building new higher precision
clocks you need to build new lower noise TI counters.
This is part of the thrill (or frustration) of wor
Yes, build three and compare them but your comparator has to have a very
low noise floor. I think that in addition to building new higher precision
clocks you need to build new lower noise TI counters.
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Jim Lux wrote:
> On 3/10/12 2:42 PM, Azelio Boriani wrote:
>
On 3/10/12 2:42 PM, Azelio Boriani wrote:
Amazing, 10 at -19... will it ever be measurable?
build three and compare them?
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
Hi
Measuring it will be a lot cheaper than building a pair of them to feed the
comparison...
Bob
On Mar 10, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Azelio Boriani wrote:
> Amazing, 10 at -19... will it ever be measurable?
>
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 15:29
Amazing, 10 at -19... will it ever be measurable?
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 15:29:39 +0800
> Roger Costello wrote:
>
> > I noticed this which could potentially be a very good thing.
> >
> >
> https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/science/nuclear-clo
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 15:29:39 +0800
Roger Costello wrote:
> I noticed this which could potentially be a very good thing.
>
> https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/science/nuclear-clock-may-keep-time-universe
The paper they refere to can be found at [1] (and other related stuff
can be found on their h
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Possible replacement for FE5680A
Le 09/03/2012 08:29, Roger Costello a écrit :
> I noticed this which could potentially be a very good thing.
>
>
https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/science/nuclear-clock-may-keep-time-univer
se
Interesting. Thanks
Le 09/03/2012 08:29, Roger Costello a écrit :
I noticed this which could potentially be a very good thing.
https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/science/nuclear-clock-may-keep-time-universe
Interesting. Thanks for the ref. I am afraid it will be a while before
the price drops to $40 shipping inclu
I noticed this which could potentially be a very good thing.
https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/science/nuclear-clock-may-keep-time-universe
Apologies for the long period watching on the sidelines but I have been
learning a lot.
Regards,
Roger
___
10 matches
Mail list logo