Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. NI was: AW:Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-09-15 Thread Prologix
-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] De la part de Mark Sims Envoyé : lundi 6 juillet 2009 18:54 À : time-nuts@febo.com Objet : [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. NI was: AW: Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN The Prologix adapter has a ++addr command for changing the

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. NI was: AW: Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-06 Thread Chuck Harris
Hi Mark, Mark Sims wrote: The Prologix adapter has a ++addr command for changing the GPIB address. You can select different instruments that way. Unfortunately, the version I looked seems to have a potentially fatal flaw. When you change the ++addr, the device writes the internal microproc

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. NI was: AW:Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-06 Thread Don Latham
ssage- > From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On > Behalf Of Samuel D. [x86/CPC] > Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 10:08 AM > To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. N

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. NI was: AW:Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-06 Thread Prologix
ement' Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. NI was: AW:Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN Damn, that's a big flaw. The software I'm working on send three "++addr" commands per second. Only 4 days @24h/day to reach the limit :-/ -Message d&#x

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. NI was: AW:Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-06 Thread Robert Darlington
nal Message- > From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On > Behalf Of Robert Darlington > Sent: 06 July 2009 18:17 > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. NI was: > AW:

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. NI was: AW: Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-06 Thread Don Latham
e-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] De >> la >> part de Mark Sims >> Envoyé : lundi 6 juillet 2009 18:54 >> À : time-nuts@febo.com >> Objet : [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. NI was: AW: >> Prologix >> GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN &g

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. NI was: AW:Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-06 Thread David C. Partridge
measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. NI was: AW:Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN You can *probably* replace the EEPROM with an FRAM chip ... ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. NI was: AW: Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-06 Thread Robert Darlington
addr" commands per second. > > Only 4 days @24h/day to reach the limit :-/ > > > -Message d'origine- > De : time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] De la > part de Mark Sims > Envoyé : lundi 6 juillet 2009 18:54 > À : time-nuts@febo.c

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. NI was: AW: Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-06 Thread Samuel D. [x86/CPC]
: lundi 6 juillet 2009 18:54 À : time-nuts@febo.com Objet : [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. NI was: AW: Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN The Prologix adapter has a ++addr command for changing the GPIB address. You can select different instruments that way. Unfortunately, the version

[time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. NI was: AW: Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-06 Thread Mark Sims
The Prologix adapter has a ++addr command for changing the GPIB address. You can select different instruments that way. Unfortunately, the version I looked seems to have a potentially fatal flaw. When you change the ++addr, the device writes the internal microprocessor EEPROM. The EEPROM

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. NI was: AW: Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-06 Thread Lux, James P
On 7/6/09 5:37 AM, "John Ackermann N8UR" wrote: > > Of course, an alternative is to assign one USB or LAN GPIB unit to each > instrument, but that gets expensive. > Yes, if you're scrounging old test equipment for $100 a copy. If you have chunks of gear that cost $10K each, then $100-200

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. NI was: AW: Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-06 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
A bit further to Ulrich's point... one area where I had some problems using serial/gpib converters in the old days, and I think that at least early versions of the Prologix USB unit suffered from, is talking to multiple instruments off the same GPIB controller. I never found a satisfactory way

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-05 Thread Chuck Harris
Chad Simpson wrote: I'm looking for something that I can write python or tcl or shell scripts for and send strings to a GPIB device, and get strings back. I'm trying to get away from the LabView .vi model. So, this looks fairly good, that way. Jim Yes, me too - shell or python would be gr

[time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN vs. NI was: AW: Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-05 Thread Ulrich Bangert
Im Auftrag von Chad Simpson > Gesendet: Montag, 6. Juli 2009 04:41 > An: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Betreff: Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN > > > Good points... and pretty much in line with my thinking. > Based on the comments here

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-05 Thread Chad Simpson
Good points... and pretty much in line with my thinking. Based on the comments here, I'm strongly leaning toward the LAN version now. I'll definitely have a closer look at the KE5FX toolkit, there are some very interesting applications there. Thanks everyone for your input. Looks like I have a

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-05 Thread Chad Simpson
Yes, it should be pretty simple, even in shell. I have some noodle-scratching to do on retrieving graphical output from instruments though. I'm not terribly concerned about being compatible with other hardware, as long as the hardware I get won't be left useless or anchored to an archaic OS becau

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-05 Thread Robert Darlington
If you are willing to (or want to) write your own software, than the Prologix Ethernet adapter is the way to go. I've done it in PERL under Solaris and IRIX without any trouble. Just open a socket connection on port 23 and send over text commands. Very easy. MUCH easier than using NI products.

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-05 Thread Chad Simpson
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Lux, James P wrote: > > On 7/4/09 8:36 PM, "Robert Darlington" wrote: > > > I have a GPIB-LAN, and it works. You basically telnet to it and issue > > commands either manually or via software. It works with EZ-GPIB without > any > > trouble. It's extremely easy

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-05 Thread Prologix
-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Hal Murray Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2009 8:26 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN > Thus the GPIB-LAN device should work with OS-X whereas the GPIB-USB > device will need a

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-05 Thread Demian Martin
I looked at the Prologix stuff long and hard BUT it is something of a dead end. I didn't want to write new software and I have some existing apps that I use. I found an NI gpib-enet ( http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/D2

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-05 Thread Esa Heikkinen
If it's about "Ethernet vs. USB" queston I would always suggest Ethernet. - With any kind of equipment in question! Ethernet is simpy much better: you don't need device drivers, it works with longer cables (over 10 times longer than USB), it's routable, you can use it remotely (VPN), you can t

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-05 Thread wje
Lux, James P wrote: I'm looking for something that I can write python or tcl or shell scripts for and send strings to a GPIB device, and get strings back. I'm trying to get away from the LabView .vi model. So, this looks fairly good, that way. Jim I have one of the LAN units also. I've wri

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-05 Thread philip...@gmx.de
Hi Chad, i have some Agilent E5810A GPIB-LAN-Gateways for sale. They are used but like new. You can got more informations here: http://129.69.137.180/gpib/ Price is 299 EUR incl. german VAT plus shipping. You will get an invoice. We also have GPIB-cables 0.5m in stock, 10 EUR for one cable. If

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-04 Thread Lux, James P
On 7/4/09 8:36 PM, "Robert Darlington" wrote: > I have a GPIB-LAN, and it works. You basically telnet to it and issue > commands either manually or via software. It works with EZ-GPIB without any > trouble. It's extremely easy to use. > > That being said, it is not a substitute for a GPIB

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-04 Thread Robert Darlington
I have a GPIB-LAN, and it works. You basically telnet to it and issue commands either manually or via software. It works with EZ-GPIB without any trouble. It's extremely easy to use. That being said, it is not a substitute for a GPIB card from NI. I wrote a spiffy software program in VB to pul

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-04 Thread Hal Murray
> Thus the GPIB-LAN device should work with OS-X whereas the GPIB-USB > device will need a driver (currently there doesn't appear to be one so > you would need to roll your own). I'd be surprised if it takes any driver work. I have one of the older Prologix units. It uses one of the FTDI USB to

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-04 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Chad Simpson wrote: > Hello all, this is my first post to the list... > > Like many of you, over time I've acquired enough test equipment with the > GPIB interface that I'm wanting to make use of it. I have narrowed the > choice down to one of the Prologix devices (GPIB-USB or GPIB-LAN), but I > h

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-04 Thread Hal Murray
> Like many of you, over time I've acquired enough test equipment with > the GPIB interface that I'm wanting to make use of it. I have > narrowed the choice down to one of the Prologix devices (GPIB-USB or > GPIB-LAN), but I haven't found much information about the differences > between the two.

Re: [time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-04 Thread Lux, James P
On 7/4/09 7:43 PM, "Chad Simpson" wrote: > Hello all, this is my first post to the list... > > Like many of you, over time I've acquired enough test equipment with the > GPIB interface that I'm wanting to make use of it. I have narrowed the > choice down to one of the Prologix devices (GPIB-

[time-nuts] Prologix GPIB-USB vs. GPIB-LAN

2009-07-04 Thread Chad Simpson
Hello all, this is my first post to the list... Like many of you, over time I've acquired enough test equipment with the GPIB interface that I'm wanting to make use of it. I have narrowed the choice down to one of the Prologix devices (GPIB-USB or GPIB-LAN), but I haven't found much information a