OK, thanks for the clarifications.
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Magnus Danielson wrote:
> On 04/09/2012 06:40 PM, Azelio Boriani wrote:
>
>> Interesting, now two questions:
>>
>>
>> It is clear that the short term is limited by the instrument trigger
>>>
>> jitter. A mixer pre->scaling is cl
On 04/09/2012 06:40 PM, Azelio Boriani wrote:
Interesting, now two questions:
It is clear that the short term is limited by the instrument trigger
jitter. A mixer pre->scaling is clearly needed.
that is, a mixing to take down the 10MHz to a lower frequency? Mixing with
a higher stability sour
On 04/09/2012 06:55 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 18:40:47 +0200
Azelio Boriani wrote:
It is clear that the short term is limited by the instrument trigger
jitter. A mixer pre->scaling is clearly needed.
that is, a mixing to take down the 10MHz to a lower frequency? Mixing with
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 18:40:47 +0200
Azelio Boriani wrote:
> >It is clear that the short term is limited by the instrument trigger
> jitter. A mixer pre->scaling is clearly needed.
>
> that is, a mixing to take down the 10MHz to a lower frequency? Mixing with
> a higher stability source?
He probab
Interesting, now two questions:
>It is clear that the short term is limited by the instrument trigger
jitter. A mixer pre->scaling is clearly needed.
that is, a mixing to take down the 10MHz to a lower frequency? Mixing with
a higher stability source?
And,
>I also gave a quick tour of just how m
Fellow time-nuts,
I spent Easter leave to go on a road-trip, taking me by fellow time-nuts
Björn and Poul-Henning, and naturally lots of other good friends.
On my way out I lent Björn one of my HP5065A and a SR620. On my way back
I looked at his measurements. One of the things which was obvio
