"Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Geoff Horner" writes:
> >I'm looking forward to the M12M gps which I believe is out Dec this year.
> >Google alerts doesn't seem to find much each week on the arrival of this
> >unit.
>
> Uhm, I thought the Oncore
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Geoff Horner" writes:
>Thanks Poul for the info.
>
>I will be getting the 4501 then.
>
>I would like a copy of NTPns. Is the copy on your web page current?
No, a lot have happened since and I'm currently actively working on it.
>I may end up using a FEI 5081a and
cy measurement"
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Soekris Net4801 vs NET4501 as Statum 1 timeserver
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Geoff Horner" writes:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Does anyone know which of the two Soekris boards ma
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Geoff Horner" writes:
>Hi all,
>
>Does anyone know which of the two Soekris boards makes a better statum 1
>time server.
The net45xx series does because you can make hardware timestamps
with it:
http://phk.freebsd.dk/soekris/pps
>Anyone used a OCXO in eit
Hi all,
Does anyone know which of the two Soekris boards makes a better statum 1 time
server. I know there is a work around for the 4801 flawed sc1100/TSC, but has
anyone compared the performance of the two? Anyone used a OCXO in either? I
have seen phk's results of the 4501, although that was
