Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data

2006-12-25 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: Magnus Danielson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 04:04:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: Magnus Danielson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data > Date: Mon,

Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data

2006-12-24 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: Magnus Danielson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 03:43:16 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Now, I made a quick little program that process the data, here is the result: Ehum... no... forget those plots. I

Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data

2006-12-24 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: John Ackermann N8UR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:51:59 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Magnus Danielson said the following on 12/23/2006 07:21 PM: > > >> Magnus Danielson said the follo

Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data

2006-12-24 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
Magnus Danielson said the following on 12/23/2006 07:21 PM: >> Magnus Danielson said the following on 12/23/2006 05:22 PM: >> >>> Such as temperature and humidity. One of the Cesiums seemed to have a rather >>> large frequency offset. Did you drift-compensate your ADEV measures or not? >> No, I ra

Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data

2006-12-24 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
Tom Clark, K3IO said the following on 12/24/2006 12:26 AM: >The straight ADEV will certainly be affected if there is a drift. The >ADEV for delta time=T is simply the RMS difference between the clock >phase at time t and time t+T. Any rate offset will appear in this >calculation.

Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data

2006-12-23 Thread Tom Clark, K3IO
As a comment on this dialogue: > > Such as temperature and humidity. One of the Cesiums seemed to have a rathe r > > large frequency offset. Did you drift-compensate your ADEV measures or not? > > No, I ran the ADEV in Stable32 without removing drift. My understanding > is that linea

Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data

2006-12-23 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: John Ackermann N8UR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 17:53:50 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi John! > Magnus Danielson said the following on 12/23/2006 05:22 PM: > > > Such as temperature and humi

Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data

2006-12-23 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
Magnus Danielson said the following on 12/23/2006 05:22 PM: > Such as temperature and humidity. One of the Cesiums seemed to have a rather > large frequency offset. Did you drift-compensate your ADEV measures or not? No, I ran the ADEV in Stable32 without removing drift. My understanding is that

Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data

2006-12-23 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 22:11:20 + Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Ackermann N8UR writes: > > >I'm running an experime

Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data

2006-12-23 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
Poul-Henning Kamp said the following on 12/23/2006 05:11 PM: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Ackermann N8UR writes: > >> I'm running an experiment with my 3 atomic standards (2 HP 5061A and 1 >> HP 5065A) versus GPS via an M12+ (no sawtooth correction). I now have >> 148 days of data, and

Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data

2006-12-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Ackermann N8UR writes: >I'm running an experiment with my 3 atomic standards (2 HP 5061A and 1 >HP 5065A) versus GPS via an M12+ (no sawtooth correction). I now have >148 days of data, and hope to keep the experiment running out to 180 days. 180 days is a bad

[time-nuts] Some long-term data

2006-12-23 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
Hi -- I'm running an experiment with my 3 atomic standards (2 HP 5061A and 1 HP 5065A) versus GPS via an M12+ (no sawtooth correction). I now have 148 days of data, and hope to keep the experiment running out to 180 days. For the fun of it this morning I ran all-tau analyses of all three standar