From: Magnus Danielson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 04:04:09 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: Magnus Danielson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data
> Date: Mon,
From: Magnus Danielson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 03:43:16 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Now, I made a quick little program that process the data, here is the result:
Ehum... no... forget those plots. I
From: John Ackermann N8UR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:51:59 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Magnus Danielson said the following on 12/23/2006 07:21 PM:
>
> >> Magnus Danielson said the follo
Magnus Danielson said the following on 12/23/2006 07:21 PM:
>> Magnus Danielson said the following on 12/23/2006 05:22 PM:
>>
>>> Such as temperature and humidity. One of the Cesiums seemed to have a rather
>>> large frequency offset. Did you drift-compensate your ADEV measures or not?
>> No, I ra
Tom Clark, K3IO said the following on 12/24/2006 12:26 AM:
>The straight ADEV will certainly be affected if there is a drift. The
>ADEV for delta time=T is simply the RMS difference between the clock
>phase at time t and time t+T. Any rate offset will appear in this
>calculation.
As a comment on this dialogue:
> > Such as temperature and humidity. One of the Cesiums seemed to have a rathe
r
> > large frequency offset. Did you drift-compensate your ADEV measures or not?
>
> No, I ran the ADEV in Stable32 without removing drift. My understanding
> is that linea
From: John Ackermann N8UR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 17:53:50 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi John!
> Magnus Danielson said the following on 12/23/2006 05:22 PM:
>
> > Such as temperature and humi
Magnus Danielson said the following on 12/23/2006 05:22 PM:
> Such as temperature and humidity. One of the Cesiums seemed to have a rather
> large frequency offset. Did you drift-compensate your ADEV measures or not?
No, I ran the ADEV in Stable32 without removing drift. My understanding
is that
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Some long-term data
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 22:11:20 +
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Ackermann N8UR writes:
>
> >I'm running an experime
Poul-Henning Kamp said the following on 12/23/2006 05:11 PM:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Ackermann N8UR writes:
>
>> I'm running an experiment with my 3 atomic standards (2 HP 5061A and 1
>> HP 5065A) versus GPS via an M12+ (no sawtooth correction). I now have
>> 148 days of data, and
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Ackermann N8UR writes:
>I'm running an experiment with my 3 atomic standards (2 HP 5061A and 1
>HP 5065A) versus GPS via an M12+ (no sawtooth correction). I now have
>148 days of data, and hope to keep the experiment running out to 180 days.
180 days is a bad
Hi --
I'm running an experiment with my 3 atomic standards (2 HP 5061A and 1
HP 5065A) versus GPS via an M12+ (no sawtooth correction). I now have
148 days of data, and hope to keep the experiment running out to 180 days.
For the fun of it this morning I ran all-tau analyses of all three
standar
12 matches
Mail list logo