Christopher Hoover wrote:
Agreed, that that regulator doesn't have sufficient margin for the entire
TADD-1.
I was suggesting using the low-noise high PSRR linear reg only to establish
the bias level.
There are indeed better parts. This one looks pretty good for an
integration solution
The power supply noise may also limit the performance.
This is my major concern with the design.
Any noise on the supply rail goes into the first stage via the bias network,
and is transferred at whatever gain to the output.
I noticed that when I used a particular bad wall wart to run one of
Christopher Hoover wrote:
The power supply noise may also limit the performance.
This is my major concern with the design.
Any noise on the supply rail goes into the first stage via the bias network,
and is transferred at whatever gain to the output.
I noticed that when I used a
The TI regulators are, from my perspective extremely noisy, one can do
much better at least for higher output voltages.
They also don't have a high enough output for the TADD-1.
Agreed, that that regulator doesn't have sufficient margin for the entire
TADD-1.
I was suggesting using the
Chris
Christopher Hoover wrote:
The TI regulators are, from my perspective extremely noisy, one can do
much better at least for higher output voltages.
They also don't have a high enough output for the TADD-1.
Agreed, that that regulator doesn't have sufficient margin for the entire
