I also would like to know the answer to that question if you use the 1 PPS
of the Tbolt versus the M12 or maybe a later model affordable GPS engine.
Bert Kehren
In a message dated 3/16/2011 11:18:23 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
albertson.ch...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at
-nuts] Thunderbolt vs Motorola M12+T
I also would like to know the answer to that question if you use the 1 PPS
of the Tbolt versus the M12 or maybe a later model affordable GPS engine.
Bert Kehren
In a message dated 3/16/2011 11:18:23 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
albertson.ch...@gmail.com
/experience/tips?
thanks,
Fred
- Original Message
From: ewkeh...@aol.com ewkeh...@aol.com
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thu, March 17, 2011 10:56:29 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt vs Motorola M12+T
I also would like to know the answer to that question if you use the 1
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Tijd Dingen tijddin...@yahoo.com wrote:
Same here. A GPSDO like the thunderbolt is really nice from a system
integration point of view. Buy an easy thingy kit on ebay, and you have
your 10 MHz reference. However, cannot a lot be gained from using a
more
@febo.com
Verschickt: Do., 17. Mrz. 2011, 13:45
Thema: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt vs Motorola M12+T
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Tijd Dingen tijddin...@yahoo.com wrote:
Same here. A GPSDO like the thunderbolt is really nice from a system
integration point of view. Buy an easy thingy kit
will not have to use
fraction.
Bert Kehren
-Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-
Von: Tijd Dingen tijddin...@yahoo.com
An: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Verschickt: Do., 17. Mrz. 2011, 14:01
Thema: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt vs Motorola M12+T
7:42:55 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt vs Motorola M12+T
It depends what your definition of low jitter is. There are low noise CRO's
coupled with a PLL that will do a credible job. You may also considder a
multiple of 375 if a good CRO is available and devide it down. Look for close
From: Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thu, March 17, 2011 6:45:34 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt vs Motorola M12+T
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Tijd Dingen tijddin...@yahoo.com wrote
MHz signal. Any thought/experience/tips?
thanks,
Fred
- Original Message
From: ewkeh...@aol.com ewkeh...@aol.com
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thu, March 17, 2011 10:56:29 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt vs Motorola M12+T
I also would like to know the answer
measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thu, March 17, 2011 6:45:34 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt vs Motorola M12+T
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Tijd Dingen tijddin...@yahoo.com wrote:
Same here. A GPSDO like the thunderbolt is really nice from a system
integration point of view. Buy
Which is the preferred unit for implementing a GPS disciplined standard,
pricing aside?
Tnx
wayne
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Wayne Splawn wa...@att.net wrote:
Which is the preferred unit for implementing a GPS disciplined standard,
pricing aside?
The t-bolt is a GPS disciplined oscillator. the M12 is only a GPS and
you'd need to add the oscillator and the means to discipline it.
--
12 matches
Mail list logo
