The US changed over to the rest-of-world patent system, where patent
applications are public for a period before grant, precisely to get
input from the entire technical community.
The granted patent (8270465) would be hard to overturn at this point.
As for the patent application (2012/0082008)
On 27 Sep, 2012, at 15:40 , Jim Lux wrote:
> On 9/27/12 2:58 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> It would be interesting to hear what the patent lawyers on the list think
>> about the patents. Given a quick read, they appear to cover any use of the
>> specific transmitted format for receiving time
On 9/27/12 2:58 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
It would be interesting to hear what the patent lawyers on the list think about
the patents. Given a quick read, they appear to cover any use of the specific
transmitted format for receiving time information.
IANAL, but..
reading Claim 1..
a key aspects
Hi
It would be interesting to hear what the patent lawyers on the list think about
the patents. Given a quick read, they appear to cover any use of the specific
transmitted format for receiving time information.
Bob
On Sep 27, 2012, at 2:54 PM, Scott Newell wrote:
> Looks like one has issued
Useful
Thanks. What I do not see coming out is anything to help create a local
corrected 60 Khz sig. It seems to only be about time.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Scott Newell wrote:
> Looks like one has issued (8,270,465). Application 20120082008 appears to
> be relevant as well.
>
> http://
Looks like one has issued (8,270,465). Application 20120082008
appears to be relevant as well.
http://www.google.com/patents/US8270465
http://www.google.com/patents/US20120082008
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go t
