); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please excuse my ignorance [I marvel/wonder at some of the essotevric
comments on this group], but why are atomic clocks reliant on these two rare
elements? - why not mercury, or water vapor, they are a lot easier to find.
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don Collie wrote:
Please excuse my ignorance [I marvel/wonder at some of the essotevric
comments on this group], but why are atomic clocks reliant on these two rare
elements? - why not mercury, or water vapor, they are a lot
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob Paddock wrote:
On Friday 27 July 2007 04:14, Dr Bruce Griffiths wrote:
22GHz,
(15GHz)
(~40.5 GHz) than either the caesium
(9.192GHz) or rubidium
(6.8GHz)
Anything happening in the THz range, that anyone
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 27 July 2007 04:14, Dr Bruce Griffiths wrote:
22GHz,
(15GHz)
(~40.5 GHz) than either the caesium
(9.192GHz) or rubidium
(6.8GHz)
Anything happening in the THz range, that anyone knows of?
--