Re: [time-nuts] Yet another GPSDO - locking to 10MHz

2010-07-04 Thread Peter Vince
Hi Murray, Why did you use such a large division factor - or any for that matter? Could you not just have used a PLL with very long time constant running at 10 MHz? Peter On 27 June 2010 20:14, Murray Greenman murray.green...@rakon.com wrote: I have a design which locks a high

Re: [time-nuts] Yet another GPSDO - locking to 10MHz

2010-06-29 Thread Attila Kinali
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 20:59:51 -0400 Robert Benward rbenw...@verizon.net wrote: All this talk about interpolation reminds me of a little neat chip by Analog Devices, AD9500. It's programmable digital delay, bit, with lops resolution with a loons full-scale range. I believe (from app notes)

Re: [time-nuts] Yet another GPSDO - locking to 10MHz

2010-06-29 Thread Hal Murray
Unfortunately, the AD9500 line is obsolete with no replacement. Which means it will be quite soon not available anymore. On-Semi makes a programmable delay: MC100EP195, 2.2 to 12.2 ns in 10 ps steps There are a couple of other similar chips.

[time-nuts] Yet another GPSDO - locking to 10MHz

2010-06-27 Thread Murray Greenman
I have a design which locks a high performance 10MHz OCXO to a 10MHz source which should work equally well with the LEA5, or any source of 5 or 10MHz. I designed it for use with a distributed factory GPS reference which has picked up noise, hum and phase modulation, in order to deliver a high

Re: [time-nuts] Yet another GPSDO - locking to 10MHz

2010-06-27 Thread Robert Benward
To: time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 3:14 PM Subject: [time-nuts] Yet another GPSDO - locking to 10MHz I have a design which locks a high performance 10MHz OCXO to a 10MHz source which should work equally well with the LEA5, or any source of 5 or 10MHz. I designed