Re: [time-nuts] accurate portable time source

2007-12-30 Thread Brooke Clarke
> Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:19:49 -0800 > From: Brooke Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] accurate portable time source > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > <> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> &g

[time-nuts] accurate portable time source

2007-12-30 Thread Ronald Held
Brooke: Have you tried out your last idea at least in a test configuration? Ronald Message: 1 Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:19:49 -0800 From: Brooke Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] accurate portable time source To: Discuss

Re: [time-nuts] accurate portable time source

2007-12-29 Thread Brooke Clarke
Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] accurate portable time source > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement ><> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > > Hi Ronald: &

[time-nuts] accurate portable time source

2007-12-29 Thread Ronald Held
Brooke: You have been thinking about this longer than I have. I presume you have not tried to make any prototypes? Ronald Message: 1 Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:19:49 -0800 From: Brooke Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] accurate po

Re: [time-nuts] accurate portable time source

2007-12-28 Thread Brooke Clarke
Hi Ronald: Here are a some of ideas for the heart beat for a LCD based clock like the ones I've been developing. Best) A Vectron EX-380 series Vacuum OCXO only draws 0.35 Watts and if the 5 volt version that's only 70 ma. So a single AA would have enough energy, three AAA Ni-MH would be great

Re: [time-nuts] accurate portable time source (Ronald Held)

2007-12-28 Thread Tom Van Baak
> To Tom: > I will look at those products. Isn't there a problem if the > crystals are not preaged, for the accuracies I am looking for? Since > I am circuit impaired, besides the power supply, what other inputs are > needed and what is the output(1 PPS, a Frequency)? >

[time-nuts] accurate portable time source (Ronald Held)

2007-12-28 Thread Ronald Held
ay... (John Miles) 8. Re: accurate portable time source (Tom Van Baak) -- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:35:40 -0500 From: "Ronald Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [time-nuts] accurate portable time sour

Re: [time-nuts] accurate portable time source

2007-12-28 Thread Tom Van Baak
> This request is different than the last one. > The most accurate TCXO watch is about 1 seconds/year, with regular > wear and lots of adjustment. For at least 1 order of magnitude in > accuracy, what can be made/bought given these initial requirements: it > has to run of its own power supply for ~

Re: [time-nuts] accurate portable time source

2007-12-28 Thread Jeff Mock
Ronald Held wrote: > This request is different than the last one. > The most accurate TCXO watch is about 1 seconds/year, with regular > wear and lots of adjustment. [...] Really? What watch is good to 1s per year? Can you point me at one? That's amazing for a watch. jeff __

Re: [time-nuts] accurate portable time source

2007-12-28 Thread Hal Murray
> it has to run of its own power supply for ~18 hours a day, and > recharge fully at night. the device must be intrinsically accurate > without be disciplined by an external signal, although that could be > done at night. The size and wei8ght need to be pocketable such a a > large cell phone.I Is

[time-nuts] accurate portable time source

2007-12-28 Thread Ronald Held
This request is different than the last one. The most accurate TCXO watch is about 1 seconds/year, with regular wear and lots of adjustment. For at least 1 order of magnitude in accuracy, what can be made/bought given these initial requirements: it has to run of its own power supply for ~18 hours a