In message , Magnus D
anielson writes:
Years ago I ran into this paper:
https://fas.org/irp/agency/dod/jason/statistics.pdf
What is amazing about it, is that back in 1992 they nailed the
odds of climate change to north of 100k, in a statistically
rigorous manner.
They can do th
Hi
On 12/18/2017 01:03 AM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
You then hit the very basic fact that a “standard noise process” does not cover
what real oscillators or amplifiers
do in the field. They have a *lot* of “noise like” issues that impact their
performance. Simply coming up with a model
for this or tha
Hi
> On Dec 17, 2017, at 6:50 PM, Magnus Danielson
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 12/17/2017 03:09 PM, Mattia Rizzi wrote:
>>> you demand ergodicity, you cannot have 1/f. You can have only one or the
>> other. Not both. And if you choose ergodicity, you will not faithfully
>> model a clock.
>> I am
Hi,
On 12/17/2017 03:09 PM, Mattia Rizzi wrote:
you demand ergodicity, you cannot have 1/f. You can have only one or the
other. Not both. And if you choose ergodicity, you will not faithfully
model a clock.
I am talking about the issues of flicker noise processes for an
experimentalist. I know
Hi,
Finally I have time to answer it properly.
Let's do a quick recap. Topic is flicker noise, statistics theory vs
experimental hypothesis. I am aware that flicker noise, in stochastic
theory, it's not ergodic nor stationary.
Mattia#1: (If you striclty apply the stochastic theory) you are not al
Hi
> On Nov 30, 2017, at 11:10 AM, Magnus Danielson
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/30/2017 03:40 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 12:44:13 +0100
>> Mattia Rizzi wrote:
>>> Let me emphasize your sentence: "you will have a statistically significant
>>> number of samples of *one* realiz
On 11/30/2017 03:40 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 12:44:13 +0100
Mattia Rizzi wrote:
Let me emphasize your sentence: "you will have a statistically significant
number of samples of *one* realization of the random variable.".
This sentence is the meaning of ergodic process [
h
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 12:44:13 +0100
Mattia Rizzi wrote:
> Let me emphasize your sentence: "you will have a statistically significant
> number of samples of *one* realization of the random variable.".
> This sentence is the meaning of ergodic process [
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergodic_proce