Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 66, Issue 6

2010-01-04 Thread David C. Partridge
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 66, Issue 6 So what... ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 66, Issue 6

2010-01-04 Thread Steve Rooke
Under nix, I believe that running like this will result in the kernel penalising the process by dropping it's priority as it is showing up as a process hog. This isn't good for LH as it may not get the CPU cycles when it actually needs them. 2010/1/4 Christopher Hoover c...@murgatroid.com: On

Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 66, Issue 6

2010-01-04 Thread bg
Lets not sell the hide until the bear is shoot... Lets worry about implementation problems once there is a *nix-port to worry about. I think the graphics/gui will be a bigger problem to port. Any thoughts about porting the GUI? -- Björn Under nix, I believe that running like this will

Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 66, Issue 6

2010-01-04 Thread Steve Rooke
[mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Mark Sims Sent: 03 January 2010 23:55 To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 66, Issue 6 So what... ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe

Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 66, Issue 6

2010-01-04 Thread John Miles
and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 66, Issue 6 It really needs to be event driven. Steve Roke 2010/1/4 David C. Partridge david.partri...@dsl.pipex.com: The so what is that you incur a ring 3 to ring 0 transition and return each time you do

Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 66, Issue 6

2010-01-04 Thread Steve Rooke
-Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]on Behalf Of Steve Rooke Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 3:33 AM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 66, Issue 6 It really needs

Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 66, Issue 6

2010-01-04 Thread John Miles
Do you have a high-level schematic of the code in design form as it's really just a coding exercise from that onto another platform or into a form that would work cross-platform? You have done all the hard-yards in the design of this and it's that, that takes the most time and effort.

Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 66, Issue 6

2010-01-03 Thread Mark Sims
So what... Actually Heather does not poll the serial port continually. It uses the Windows interrupt driven serial I/O routines that fill a big buffer in the background. What is does do is continually ask give me a serial port character if you have one. It makes no practical difference

Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 66, Issue 6

2010-01-03 Thread Steve Rooke
2010/1/4 Mark Sims hol...@hotmail.com: As far as the time slicing goes,  the code is continually doing Sleep(0) calls.  These give the time slice back to Windows.    You can't get much more multitask friendly than that. If Windows has nothing better to do,  it gives the time back to Heather

Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 66, Issue 6

2010-01-03 Thread Christopher Hoover
On 1/3/2010 5:53 PM, time-nuts-requ...@febo.com wrote: It's not an issue, except possibly vis-a-vis battery life in a laptop. I haven't looked at the source code, but there are other concerns with the while (true) { checkStuff(); Sleep(0); } approach. According to the TFM, Sleep(0) is