Well thats a heck of a tidbit to learn.
I built up hack multipliers and such to get some of the old GPS receivers
going.
The best was austron 2001. I did retire it as it was really getting to be a
pain to operate.
You had to know what your doing. Not sure I like that. Neo's have spoiled
me.
What wa
On 8/15/18 2:20 PM, paul swed wrote:
Wanted to add a bit to the conversation. At least in a number of older GPS
receivers circa 1989-1994 the LO was indeed locked to a 10 MHz reference.
These were the typical separate mixer and antenna systems. The first LO was
1500 MHz.
That is an expensive way
Wanted to add a bit to the conversation. At least in a number of older GPS
receivers circa 1989-1994 the LO was indeed locked to a 10 MHz reference.
These were the typical separate mixer and antenna systems. The first LO was
1500 MHz.
That is an expensive way to go so I can see why whats described
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 23:03:46 -0400
Charles Steinmetz wrote:
> > If you want a product that ships on time, you dont buy Maxim ;-)
>
> While I agree with the sentiment, I imagine that time nuts who are
> looking for solutions on-list are mostly hobbyists, not industrial
> designers (who would al
> On 15 Aug 2018, at 14:46, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>
> In message
> , Peter
> Vince writes:
>
>> I was astonished to see the pulse-width in the document defined from the
>> base of the (sharp-cornered!) edges, and not the mid-point - totally
>> impractical!
>
> Given that the ou
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 8:40 AM Dana Whitlow wrote:
> On Peter Vince's topic, *does anybody in the group know what part of the*
> *waveforms transmitted by WWV & WWVB mark the second boundaries?*
>
> For WWV and WWVH, the second marker is the beginning of the first cycle of
the tick waveform. See
In message
, Peter
Vince writes:
>I was astonished to see the pulse-width in the document defined from the
>base of the (sharp-cornered!) edges, and not the mid-point - totally
>impractical!
Given that the output is not specified into a defined impedance,
termination or even cable-leng
On Peter Vince's topic, *does anybody in the group know what part of the*
*waveforms transmitted by WWV & WWVB mark the second boundaries?*
I was once comparing the timing of PPS pulses from a GPS receiver with
WWV's ticks, and saw about 5 msec delay to the ticks (in south central
Texas).
Obviousl
I was astonished to see the pulse-width in the document defined from the
base of the (sharp-cornered!) edges, and not the mid-point - totally
impractical! Near the top of the previous page it says: "If required for
testing purposes, the pulse width at the 50% level may be determined by
extrapolati
