Re: [time-nuts] LN RB

2019-02-06 Thread John Miles
(Forwarded message from Said below) -Original Message- From: Said Jackson [mailto:saidj...@jackson-labs.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2019 4:25 PM To: 'John Miles'; 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' Subject: RE: [time-nuts] LN RB Gents, We have to also put this

[time-nuts] Att: Hugh Rice

2019-02-06 Thread Ulf Kylenfall via time-nuts
This is a note of Encouragement. Best Regards Ulf KylenfallOnsalaSweden ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Auto-fail-over switch

2019-02-06 Thread Leo Bodnar
Would this work? http://www.wenzel.com/wp-content/parts/501-09371.pdf I have few of these, they have good enough PN to be used as run-around reference source for measurements: http://www.ebay.com/itm/16307191 Leo > From: Jeff Blaine > > Wondered if anyone had seen some sort of gadget

Re: [time-nuts] GPS Weekly Rollover Fail

2019-02-06 Thread Tim Shoppa
This will be my Z3801A's second rollover and its third 1024-week epoch. Is there any pre-1980 GPS equipment still out there that will be undergoing a third rollover and fourth 1024-week epoch? Was the 1978-1979 Block 1 GPS usage, using a different base date, or were there more fundamental

Re: [time-nuts] GPS Weekly Rollover Fail

2019-02-06 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi One would *hope* that everybody making multi GNSS modules would be cross checking and taking care of GPS rollover that way. It’s always nice to see them explicitly stating that they are doing it. Bob > On Feb 6, 2019, at 12:57 AM, Michael Wouters > wrote: > > BeiDou, Galileo and GLONASS

Re: [time-nuts] GPS Weekly Rollover Fail

2019-02-06 Thread Michael Wouters
BeiDou, Galileo and GLONASS all broadcast UTC time of day (or thereabouts for GLONASS - it's offset by the timezone for Moscow) so any multi-GNSS receiver has a sanity check on UTC calculated from GPS. Michael On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 11:03 am, Bob kb8tq wrote: > Hi > > From what I can see, you